Thanks, I see.
Rob.
> On 18 Jan 2018, at 14:09, Raul Miller wrote:
>
> It's trying to tell you that you need a ':' in your adverb definition
> so that the resulting explicit code accepts an x argument.
>
> See also: http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d310n.htm (or maybe
> the NuVoc para
It's trying to tell you that you need a ':' in your adverb definition
so that the resulting explicit code accepts an x argument.
See also: http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d310n.htm (or maybe
the NuVoc parallel...).
Try:
monad2dyad 1 :(':';'u x,y')
or
monad2dyad 1 :'u@,'
or
monad2dya
Hi,
This adverb works fine
NB. Adverb.. Allows x u y to be expressed as u dyad2monad x y
dyad2monad =: 1 : '({.y) u }.y'
- dyad2monad 1 3 NB. Should give _2
_2
But this one fails...
NB. Adverb.. allows u x y to be expressed as x u monad2dyad y
monad2dyad =: 1 : 'u x, y'
1 -mona
