Thanks Henry!
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, 15:47 Henry Rich, wrote:
> The next beta will remove one leading blank line from the display.
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 1/19/2021 9:22 PM, Ric Sherlock wrote:
> > In a similar vein,
> > The first line of a multi-line definition doesn't respect indentation,
> so:
>
The next beta will remove one leading blank line from the display.
Henry Rich
On 1/19/2021 9:22 PM, Ric Sherlock wrote:
In a similar vein,
The first line of a multi-line definition doesn't respect indentation, so:
mutate=: {{idxmut=. I. x >: (*/$y) ?@$ 0
(populate idxmut) idxmut"_} y
}}
I'll see what I can do.
Henry Rich
On 1/19/2021 9:22 PM, Ric Sherlock wrote:
In a similar vein,
The first line of a multi-line definition doesn't respect indentation, so:
mutate=: {{idxmut=. I. x >: (*/$y) ?@$ 0
(populate idxmut) idxmut"_} y
}}
mutate
4 : 0
idxmut=. I. x >: (*/$y) ?@
In a similar vein,
The first line of a multi-line definition doesn't respect indentation, so:
mutate=: {{idxmut=. I. x >: (*/$y) ?@$ 0
(populate idxmut) idxmut"_} y
}}
mutate
4 : 0
idxmut=. I. x >: (*/$y) ?@$ 0
(populate idxmut) idxmut"_} y
)
mutate=: {{ idxmut=. I. x >: (*/$y) ?@$ 0
Starting with the next beta JE will remove excess trailing blanks at the
end, leaving just one space.
Henry Rich
On 1/19/2021 1:18 PM, John Baker wrote:
Direct definition has added another, more convenient way to define local J
words
on the fly. It is particularly useful for creating verbs, ad
My attempt to preserve the user's original spacing misfired. I'll see
what I can do.
Henry Rich
On 1/19/2021 1:18 PM, John Baker wrote:
Direct definition has added another, more convenient way to define local J
words
on the fly. It is particularly useful for creating verbs, adverbs and
conjun
Direct definition has added another, more convenient way to define local J
words
on the fly. It is particularly useful for creating verbs, adverbs and
conjunctions
within explicit definitions.
However there are gotchas. One thing I've noticed is the repeated addition
of a
trailing blank to DDs wit
