nice Raul, thank you.
- Original Message -
From: Raul Miller
To: Programming forum
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 2:41:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Existing a Tacit
I think this should be equivalent?
bs=: 2 :'u/@(}.~ # |&>: v i: 1:)'
Thanks,
--
Raul
gt;
> the overhead allows about 100M checks per second for (0=])
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
> To: "programm...@jsoftware.com"
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 12:42:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming]
ead allows about 100M checks per second for (0=])
- Original Message -
From: 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
To: "programm...@jsoftware.com"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 12:42:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Existing a Tacit
to expand on what you are sayi
The closing sentence of Ken Iverson's Turing Lecture
http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/tot.htm :
Finally, overemphasis of efficiency leads to an unfortunate circularity in
design: for reasons of efficiency early programming languages reflected the
characteristics of the early computers, and each gen
t will have the best performance.
>
> Still would be nice to have a tacit break. function.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Raul Miller
> To: Programming forum
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 11:57:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Existing a Taci
Still would be nice to have a tacit break. function.
- Original Message -
From: Raul Miller
To: Programming forum
Cc:
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 11:57:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Existing a Tacit
The best technique for avoiding work is to not specify it in the first
place.
@. does wo
The best technique for avoiding work is to not specify it in the first
place.
@. does work, of course.
:: is another option.
^: is another option.
Often, though, it's better to instead specify an operation which does the
right thing instead of "exiting early". The reason for this has to do with
What techniques or methods can be used to exit a tacit at multiple points
depending on the results of the data flow through the tacit ?.
In an explicit this is achieved by using the control statement "return." a
multiple times.
A simple case for one exit would be to use something like:
f1
