On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Michal D. wrote:
>> I'd want to
>> understand why you've used "0 1 in its definition - do you really
>> support vector left arguments?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean - what kind of rank would you like to see?
"1 would be slightly more concise than "0 1 (for examp
>
> In rep_ravel (which should be defined using =: rather than =. unless
> you fix (f.) the definition of rep) you can replace
>
Good call, thanks for spotting this.
>
> #&0@:(1&{)@:$@:]
>
> with
>
> 0 * {.@]
>
I was thinking of something along these lines but thought there would be
problems wi
In rep_ravel (which should be defined using =: rather than =. unless
you fix (f.) the definition of rep) you can replace
#&0@:(1&{)@:$@:]
with
0 * {.@]
You can also simplify rep_stride I imagine (and it should also be
defined using =:) but before I think about that, I'd want to
understand why y
Hi All,
I've been exploring Spectral Graph Theory recently (
http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/spielman/561/) and thought I'd try my hand at
implementing graph multiplication in J. It came out quite well. I wish
the 'rep' definition for repeating matrices on a diagonal was shorter.
Here's the code i
