Right.
Henry Rich
On 10/3/2019 5:33 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
Ok, I think I begin to understand...
(I'm pretty sure you're saying this particular check is just about
name re-use and maybe reference count handling, and that memory re-use
or in-place array update happens elsewhere with additional t
Ok, I think I begin to understand...
(I'm pretty sure you're saying this particular check is just about
name re-use and maybe reference count handling, and that memory re-use
or in-place array update happens elsewhere with additional tests.)
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 4:21 PM Henry
Yes, everything is safe to use. The message (which obviously I didn't
mean to send to the Forum) was about a bug
name =: (verb adverb_locative_) verb noun
which messed up the execution of the adverb.
In my terminology, a verb is 'assignment-safe' if it is ok to execute
the verb in-place whe
V0=: V1=: ,~
Safe?
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:59 PM Henry Rich wrote:
>
> This turned out to be a very deep problem. After I fixed it & ran his
> code, I get a crash in mema where Windows says memory has been modified
> out of bounds. I am assuming this is his error, but in c
This turned out to be a very deep problem. After I fixed it & ran his
code, I get a crash in mema where Windows says memory has been modified
out of bounds. I am assuming this is his error, but in case not I think
you should give him a version with the latest fix to test with.
It turned out
