Right!
Henry Rich
On 3/19/2014 1:24 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
Ok.
4 :0
1y2x
:
0
)
4 :0 ignores the monadic part of the definition.
Here's another oddity:
F=:3 :0
1
:
2
:
3
)
Predict:
F 'c'
'a' F 'b'
Thanks,
---
Ok.
4 :0
1y2x
:
0
)
4 :0 ignores the monadic part of the definition.
Here's another oddity:
F=:3 :0
1
:
2
:
3
)
Predict:
F 'c'
'a' F 'b'
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Henry Rich wrote:
> That's silly enough, but I meant that one of the lines read by the : t
That's silly enough, but I meant that one of the lines read by the :
that defined the verb was 1y2x.
(in your example, the : that defines the verb doesn't read lines from
the script).
Henry Rich
On 3/18/2014 7:59 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
Here's one way:
F=: 3 :(0 :0-.LF)
x+y
NB.
1
Here's one way:
F=: 3 :(0 :0-.LF)
x+y
NB.
1y2x
)
(This presumes that "One the lines" meant "One of the lines").
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Henry Rich wrote:
> I wrote the explicit definition of a verb. It used : 0 to read lines from
> the script it was defi
I wrote the explicit definition of a verb. It used : 0 to read lines
from the script it was defined in. One the lines, encountered before
the end-of-verb delimiter ), was
1y2x
(just the 4 characters). Yet, the definition was created without error.
How is this possible?
Henry Rich
--
