Yes, we have tracked it down. the x in 0x1 was being interpreted (in
the Linux version of strtod) as a valid numeric character. The problem
afflicts ONLY numeric constants that begin with 0x, and is therefore
rarely encountered.
Henry Rich
On 12/17/2017 5:15 PM, Don Kelly wrote:
The error d
The error doesn't appear in J806 Windows 10/64 bit /amd a10-7800
Don
On 2017-12-16 7:49 PM, bill lam wrote:
On j android, it looks like that
0xn is evaluated as nxn
0x1
2.71828
1x1
2.71828
0x2
14.7781
2x2
14.7781
0x3
60.2566
3x3
60.2566
On Dec 17, 2017 12:33 AM, "Henry
And on IOS as well.
0x1
2.71828
9!:14 ''
j701/2011-01-10/11:25 build: Aug 8 2017 09:57:13
0x1
2.71828
9!:14 ''
j701/2011-01-10/11:25 build: Jun 10 2012 21:52:05
Cheers, bob
> On Dec 16, 2017, at 4:15 PM, neit...@gaertner.de wrote:
>
> 0x1
> 2.71828
> 9!:14''
> j806/j32/raspberry/b
On j android, it looks like that
0xn is evaluated as nxn
0x1
2.71828
1x1
2.71828
0x2
14.7781
2x2
14.7781
0x3
60.2566
3x3
60.2566
On Dec 17, 2017 12:33 AM, "Henry Rich" wrote:
> When I try it (on a couple of different J versions) I get
>0x1
> 0
>0x0
> 0
> etc.
>
> If you
0x1
2.71828
9!:14''
j806/j32/raspberry/beta/commercial/www.jsoftware.com/2017-09-18T01:24:43
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
I was not aware of these results being strange. They seemed correct to
me. Just wanted to help
Dmitry Khalansky as soon as possible, that's all.
/Erling
On 2017-12-16 17:36, Eric Iverson wrote:
Erling,
Jx is NOT J!
Please do not report 'strange results' from Jx to the J programming forum!
Seems to affect avx version of Mac as well. At least I believe that is the
version that I am running, although I don't see an indication in the system
info from 9!:14
0x1
2.71828
9!:14 ''
j806/j64/darwin/release/commercial/www.jsoftware.com/2017-11-06T10:20:33
Cheers, bob
> On Dec 16,
I confirm that on the 806 release linux that:
0x1
2.7128
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Henry Rich wrote:
> 0x1
>
> 0
>
>9!:14''
>
> j806/j64/windows/release/commercial/www.jsoftware.com/2017-11-06T10:03:54
>
>
> Something Linux-related?
>
>
> Henry Rich
>
>
>
>
> On 12/16/2017 12:31 P
0x1
0
9!:14''
j806/j64/windows/release/commercial/www.jsoftware.com/2017-11-06T10:03:54
Something Linux-related?
Henry Rich
On 12/16/2017 12:31 PM, J. Patrick Harrington wrote:
0x1
2.71828
9!:14''
j806/j64/linux/release/commercial/www.jsoftware.com/2017-11-06T09:54:01
and same re
0x1
2.71828
9!:14''
j806/j64/linux/release/commercial/www.jsoftware.com/2017-11-06T09:54:01
and same result on the nonavx version of 806 on my mac.
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, Henry Rich wrote:
When I try it (on a couple of different J versions) I get
0x1
0
0x0
0
etc.
If your error persis
Erling,
Jx is NOT J!
Please do not report 'strange results' from Jx to the J programming forum!
This can cause all kinds of unnecessary confusion.
You can report strange Jx results to the chat forum.
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Erling Hellenäs
wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I get
>
>0x1
> 0
>
When I try it (on a couple of different J versions) I get
0x1
0
0x0
0
etc.
If your error persists please run
9!:14''
to indicate what version you are running, and report the error again.
Welcome to J!
Henry Rich
On 12/16/2017 6:19 AM, roua...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
Could someone plea
Hi !
I get
0x1
0
eu=:2.71828
0*eu^0
0
This is J8.06 with Jx patches.
Cheers,
Erling Hellenäs
On 2017-12-16 12:19, roua...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
Could someone please shed some light on the following behavior:
1p1
3.14159
0p1
0
0p0
0
1x1
2.71828
0x1
2.71828
0
Hi.
Could someone please shed some light on the following behavior:
1p1
3.14159
0p1
0
0p0
0
1x1
2.71828
0x1
2.71828
0x0
0
I don't understand why 0x1 isn't the same as 0 * ^1 even though
other constants seem to obey this form. I haven't found any
explanation in
http://www.jsoftw
14 matches
Mail list logo
