-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
[mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Alex
Giannakopoulos
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 2:21 AM
To: programm...@jsoftware.com
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] another example of 'under'
On 15 October 2012 06:37, Linda Alvord wrote:
>Sometimes you get
On 15 October 2012 06:37, Linda Alvord wrote:
>Sometimes you get the double of the reciprocal and other times the
> reciprocal of the double.
>
Erm, not quite, Linda.
You will see that the hook (%+:) will always return 0.5, no matter what
the input.
Remember, (fg)y means y f gy when you
Sometimes you get the double of the reciprocal and other times the
reciprocal of the double.
Linda
-Original Message-
From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
[mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of km
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 6:35 PM
To: programm..
;'g'
>> -- 3
>> -- : -+- ,:'%+/%y'
>>
>>
>> Linda
>>
>>
>> Original Message-
>> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of km
>>
>
>5!:4 <'g'
> -- 3
> -- : -+- ,:'%+/%y'
>
>
> Linda
>
>
> Original Message-
> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of km
> ent: Sunday, October 14, 2
om] On Behalf Of km
ent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 12:09 AM
To: programm...@jsoftware.com
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] another example of 'under'
Why don't you just do
pr =: 3 : '%+/%y'
?
Kip Murray
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 13, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Keith Park wr
Why don't you just do
pr =: 3 : '%+/%y'
?
Kip Murray
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 13, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Keith Park wrote:
> To find the value of resistors in parallel one takes the reciprocal of the
> sum of the reciprocals. So I would like to write a verb to do just
> that. *pr=:%+/%
>
I suppose that the explicit definition as proposed by Bill an Linda come
closest to what I would like. It will be a while before I understand it
though.
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 9:23 PM, alexgian wrote:
> My understanding is that by using 'cap' you are definitely using a fork,
> but 'capping' th
Also it may be of use to you to be aware of the "magic 13"
which will translate explicits into tacits for you (not always in the best
way, but still a great learning tool)
for instance
13 : '% +/ % y'
[: % [: +/ %
--
For in
My understanding is that by using 'cap' you are definitely using a fork,
but 'capping' the one end of it!
So whereas (f b g) y would give you something like
fy b gy (where b is an infix operator and f and g are unary)
then, ([: b g) y would become something like
b of gy so you end up with
Thanks. Cap is sort of what I was looking for. A bit ugly though, but I
suppose it is the price to pay for not having some sort of operator to
deliberately invoke a hook or a fork.
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 7:57 PM, alexgian wrote:
> I asked this question almost three years ago, when I was first
.com] On Behalf Of bill lam
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2012 7:04 PM
To: programm...@jsoftware.com
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] another example of 'under'
try %@(+/)@:%
or in explicit form
3 : '% +/ % y'
untested.
Сбт, 13 Окт 2012, Keith Park писал(а):
> To find the value
I asked this question almost three years ago, when I was first starting.
Almost the same people answered it, and quite at length, too!
If you want some explanations on the options of composing using the 'cap'
([:) or the compose (@) you can look here:
http://jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/201
I asked this question almost three years ago, when I was first starting.
Almost the same people answered it, and quite at length, too!
If you want some explanations on the options of composing using the 'cap'
([:) or the compose (@) you can look here:
http://jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/201
To turn your phase in to a tacit verb you could do
p=: [: % [: +/ %
Or
p=: %@:(+/@:%)
Or as already suggested in this thread
p=: +/&.:%
On Oct 14, 2012 11:55 AM, "Keith Park" wrote:
> To find the value of resistors in parallel one takes the reciprocal of the
> sum of the reciprocals. S
try %@(+/)@:%
or in explicit form
3 : '% +/ % y'
untested.
Сбт, 13 Окт 2012, Keith Park писал(а):
> To find the value of resistors in parallel one takes the reciprocal of the
> sum of the reciprocals. So I would like to write a verb to do just
> that. *pr=:%+/%
>*But that, of course, does
To find the value of resistors in parallel one takes the reciprocal of the
sum of the reciprocals. So I would like to write a verb to do just
that. *pr=:%+/%
*But that, of course, doesn't work. So my question is "is there a way
of avoiding unwanted hooks and forks?"
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:
Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
> In the sentence:
>
>+/&.:% resistances
>
> the phrase +/&.:% is a verb which finds parallel resistance.
>
> --
> Raul
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Keith Park wrote:
> > To parallel a number of resistors the expression * %+
In the sentence:
+/&.:% resistances
the phrase +/&.:% is a verb which finds parallel resistance.
--
Raul
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Keith Park wrote:
> To parallel a number of resistors the expression * %+/% *does the job.
> How could one make an equivalent verb?
>
> On Wed, Sep 26,
To parallel a number of resistors the expression * %+/% *does the job.
How could one make an equivalent verb?
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Boyko Bantchev wrote:
> On 26 September 2012 15:39, Henry Rich wrote:
> > +&.% is the operation for combining parallel electrical resistances,
> anot
On 26 September 2012 15:39, Henry Rich wrote:
> +&.% is the operation for combining parallel electrical resistances, another
> example that immediately demonstrates the associativity.
Indeed! I had the vague feeling I know this formula from somewhere
else but it evaded me where.
> (w:h) ...
+&.% is the operation for combining parallel electrical resistances,
another example that immediately demonstrates the associativity.
(Come to think of it, if you calculate the resistance using the method
of tracing squares, resistance and aspect ratio are entirely dual concepts)
Henry Rich
Here is a nice and very simple example of 'under' I don't recall
being mentioned in the docs or in the forums.
Place two rectangles one beside the other, stretching them as needed
but preserving their aspect ratios, so that the left side of the one
coincides with the right side of the other. If
23 matches
Mail list logo
