after base library is updated, it needs to restart J session or load pacman
again to let the new je_update to take effect. The base library version is
9.0.7 now.
load'pacman'
'update'jpkg''
'upgrade'jpkg''
load'pacman'
je_update_jpacman_''
at any rate, the latest JE binaries can be downloaded fro
Eric,
That worked - I had, in fact, neglected to update the base library. Now, after
the second run of je_update_jpacman_'' I get -
9!:14''
j901/j64avx/darwin/beta-h/commercial/www.jsoftware.com/2019-08-26T15:19:32
and the impressive timing improvements came back.
Maybe including a specifi
You guys are just showing off!
JVERSION
|value error: JVERSION
2!:7''
|domain error
| 2!:7''
(J701 - IOS)
> On Aug 27, 2019, at 2:40 PM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
> wrote:
>
> 2!:7 ''
>
> avx avx2
--
For in
D'oh
Thanks Pascal and Raul,
It was the avx on the first line that I was missing. Still I am not seeing a
marked increase in performance for avx versus non avx
JVERSION
Engine: j807/j64/darwin
Release-d: commercial/2019-03-18T16:07:14
Library: 8.07.26
Qt IDE: 1.7.9/5.9.6
Platform: Darwin 64
I think 2!:7 tells what your machine is capable of, not what your J
version will do.
Henry Rich
On 8/27/2019 2:40 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:37 PM 'robert therriault' via Programming
wrote:
What should I be looking for to know whether avx is in operation? Is it 2!:7 ''?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:37 PM 'robert therriault' via Programming
wrote:
> What should I be looking for to know whether avx is in operation? Is it 2!:7
> ''?
That would work. Or you could look at the first line from JVERSION.
FYI,
--
Raul
2!:7 ''
avx avx2
works, but the very first line of JVERSION will have avx reference on "Engine:"
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019, 02:37:12 p.m. EDT, 'robert therriault' via
Programming wrote:
Hi Pascal,
What should I be looking for to know whether avx is in operation? Is it 2!:7 ''?
Hi Pascal,
What should I be looking for to know whether avx is in operation? Is it 2!:7 ''?
Cheers, bob
> On Aug 27, 2019, at 11:34 AM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
> wrote:
>
> Yes. Seems like a second je_update (does not require console command) brings
> avx.
>On Tuesday, August 27
Yes. Seems like a second je_update (does not require console command) brings
avx.
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019, 01:49:49 p.m. EDT, Eric Iverson
wrote:
Joey, Pascal,
Sounds like you are not getting the avx version.
Check the result of 9!:14'' or JVERSION. It should indicate avx, if not
Joeh,
Just noticed that the je_update_pacman_ result you report is from the old
version.
First you need to do an update to the base library. This will get you the
new version of je_update and then you might get the new avx version
installed.
1. update base library
2. je_update_jpacman_'' NB. this
Here is the result of running things again -
MBpro-3:Downloads jkt$ jb
2!:7''
avx avx2
JVERSION
Engine: j901/j64/darwin
Beta-h: commercial/2019-08-26T15:18:27
Library: 9.01.06
Platform: Darwin 64
Installer: J901 install
InstallPath: /applications/j901
Contact: www.jsoftware.com
9!:14''
Joey, Pascal,
Sounds like you are not getting the avx version.
Check the result of 9!:14'' or JVERSION. It should indicate avx, if not
then you are not running the avx version.
The 2!:7'' result should indicated the versions your hardware can run.
You may just need to do the install again so tha
Also, should JVERSION mention avx if it has found/upgraded to that engine?
(windows 10-64)
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019, 01:08:32 p.m. EDT, Joey K Tuttle
wrote:
Eric,
I'm befuddled by the NOTE: in your announcement. The install j901 beta-h went
fine, I assumed you intended '' instead
Eric,
I'm befuddled by the NOTE: in your announcement. The install j901 beta-h went
fine, I assumed you intended '' instead of a single ' ...
But, when I did my usual benchmark, it took twice as long as the version
(beta-g) that was replaced. Then I reread your note and ran it again (with no
c
Apologies for my typo.
je_update_jpacman_ '' NB. two single quote so the the verb is run
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:49 AM 'Bo Jacoby' via Programming <
programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> load'pacman'
>
> je_update_jpacman_'
>
> |open quote
>
> | je_update_jpacman_'
>
> | ^
>
> |[-1]
load'pacman'
je_update_jpacman_'
|open quote
| je_update_jpacman_'
| ^
|[-1]
je_update_jpacman_
3 : 0
if. IFIOS+.UNAME-:'Android' do. 'update not supported for this platform'
return. end.
mkdir_j_ jef
sh=. 'update.',;(UNAME-:'Win'){'sh';'bat'
ferase jef,sh
'plat name bname'=.
jandroid can use menu tools / check new version to download the new beta.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 6:38 AM Eric Iverson wrote:
> Improvements in this release allow it to be automatically installed into an
> existing j901 install (no need to run a command script).
>
> First step is to install latest
Closing quote??
> On Aug 26, 2019, at 6:37 PM, Eric Iverson wrote:
>
> je_update_jpacman_'
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
This beta has quite a few new features. Look at
https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/System/ReleaseNotes/J901 for the full list.
Important new primitives include Fold, which allows better control of
iteration.
There are several changes requested by users. Users writing modifiers
will find u./v.
Improvements in this release allow it to be automatically installed into an
existing j901 install (no need to run a command script).
First step is to install latest base library with pacman and then restart.
JE naming conventions change in beta-h. An install contains a single JE
(e.g., j.dll). An
20 matches
Mail list logo
