g
(+/ .* 1&|.) % */
h
(] +/ .* 1 |. ]) % */
h in not quite as nice as g, but I found it helpful.
Linda
-Original Message-
From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
[mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Dan Bronb
Sent: Friday, November 01, 201
ramm...@jsoftware.com
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] making this tacit
Because with f, you're asking that a NVV train be created dynamically based
on its argument: that is, you're changing syntax during execution.
There is no tacit way to express that - dynamic execution of code is the
definit
On 31/10/2013 7:01 PM, Don Kelly wrote:
OOPS my goof.SORRY- I gave misleading (i.e. stupidly erroneous)
information
What I wanted and have is
( a*b , b*c, c*a )% +.a b c
That is +/ a b c
Don
--
For information about
:'((+/ .* 1&|.)% */)y'
> g 2 3 5
> 1.0
> g
> (+/ .* 1&|.) % */
>
> Linda
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Don Kelly
> Sent: Thursday,
m: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
[mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Don Kelly
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:09 PM
To: programm...@jsoftware.com
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] making this tacit
I made an error (BIG GOOF)and gave a problem other than what I wanted so I
se
I made an error (BIG GOOF)and gave a problem other than what I wanted so
I sent you and Raul on a wild goose chase.
Your
(+/@(*/)@(,: 1&|.) % */) 2 3 5
and Raul's
((+/ .* 1&|.) % */) 2 3 5
Agree and are more material to study, Thanks
Don
On 30/10/2013 5:59 AM, Jan-Pieter Jacobs wrote:
I'
OOPS my goof.SORRY- I gave misleading (i.e. stupidly erroneous)
information
What I wanted and have is
( a*b , b*c, c*a )% +.a b c
I have now 4 versions with thanks to all
deltoy=:3 : '(y*_1|. y)%+/y' NB. original
d2y2=:+/ %~ ] * _1&|.NB.Pascal
del2y=:(] * _1 |. ]) % +/ NB. Boss us
ab+bc+ca is 1/2 the permanent. Cute.
Henry Rich
On 10/30/2013 11:20 PM, David Lambert wrote:
By chance is ab + bc + ab the permanent of
1j1#"1'1',,:~'abc'
1 1 1
a b c
a b c
>From: Raul Miller
>To: Programming forum
>Subject: Re: [Jprogrammi
By chance is ab + bc + ab the permanent of
1j1#"1'1',,:~'abc'
1 1 1
a b c
a b c
>From: Raul Miller
>To: Programming forum
>Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] making this tacit
>Message-ID:
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>
To get what you want, replace the */ in the denominator of the verbs I
defined with ]
But Henry has suggested a better approach for the numerator.
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Don Kelly wrote:
> I tried it but it doesn't work.
> What I want is result D =(a*b +b*c +c*a)
Look into
1 */\. y
Henry Rich
On 10/30/2013 10:49 PM, Don Kelly wrote:
I tried it but it doesn't work.
What I want is result D =(a*b +b*c +c*a) and get D/c, D/a, D/b
zij
3j1.5 5j1.5 7j_1.5
F zij
0.586738j_0.159111 wrong answer
d2y2=:+/ %~ ] * _1&|.(Jasmin's version)
1.57426j0.2425
I tried it but it doesn't work.
What I want is result D =(a*b +b*c +c*a) and get D/c, D/a, D/b
zij
3j1.5 5j1.5 7j_1.5
F zij
0.586738j_0.159111 wrong answer
d2y2=:+/ %~ ] * _1&|.(Jasmin's version)
1.57426j0.242574 0.920792j0.707921 2.47855j_0.0478548 Correct answer
Jasmin's answer too
Here's another way to express your concept:
((+/ .* 1&|.) % */) 2 3 5
1.0
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Jan-Pieter Jacobs <
janpieter.jac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd write it tacitly like this:
>
> (+/@(*/)@(,: 1&|.) % */) a b c
>
> This is mainly motivated by
I'd write it tacitly like this:
(+/@(*/)@(,: 1&|.) % */) a b c
This is mainly motivated by the fact that a * b + b* c + c*a can be
expressed as multiplying with a shifted version, then summing.
Jan-Pieter
2013/10/30 Raul Miller
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Don Kelly wrote:
>
> > You
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Don Kelly wrote:
> You are right but it is a bit of serendipity What I wanted is (a*b+
> b*c+c*a ) % c a b .
> it doesn't matter how the pairs are formed in the numerator ac+ba+cb is
> the same.
>
Like this?
F=: +/ .* (http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
You are right but it is a bit of serendipity What I wanted is (a*b+
b*c+c*a ) % c a b .
it doesn't matter how the pairs are formed in the numerator ac+ba+cb is
the same.
The objective is to have this sum divided by a c b a orde.r
The problem is in the notation. Single subscripts due to singular
many thanks to you , km ,Pascal Jasmin and R.E. Boss
You have come through admirably in dealing with this.
I will look at these carefully as buried in your answers is material
useful elsewhere (including my need to swot up on @:
PS: The input and output values are always of the form i j k wher
Is this the sort of thing you wanted?
It's worth noting that _1 |. y and 2 0 1 { y yield the same result, so
you don't need to use both forms in ytodel
deltoya =: (*_1&|.)%+/ NB. not tested for edge
effects.
ytodela=: ( +/@:* %] ) _1&|.
deltoya ytodela 1j2 2j1 3
1j2
ki/Community/Demographics )
> -Original Message-
> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com [mailto:programming-
> boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Don Kelly
> Sent: zaterdag 26 oktober 2013 5:37
> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
> Subject: [Jprogramming] makin
for just tacit versions:
d2y =: (] * _1&|.)%+/
or with fewer parens,
+/ %~ ] * _1&|.
y2d =: (2 0 1&{ %~ ] +/@:* _1&|.)
From: Don Kelly
To: programm...@jsoftware.com
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 11:36:35 PM
Subject: [Jprogramming] makin
Does this help?
ff =: * 1&|.
ff 2 3 4
6 12 8
2 3 4 * 3 4 2
6 12 8
--Kip Murray
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 25, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Don Kelly wrote:
>
> I have written a couple of explicit verbs for Y-delta network transforms and
> would like advice on how to express the
I have written a couple of explicit verbs for Y-delta network transforms
and would like advice on how to express them in a tacit form.
This is for my learning benefit as the use of these comes up only
occasionally and input and output are always only 3 numbers.
deltoy=:3 : '(y*_1|.y)%+/y' fr
22 matches
Mail list logo
