#'([:w[:v u)'
10
#'v&.:(u :.w)'
11
Clever, but I'm not sure I see the appeal...
(But I guess the ranks are different, so a proper comparison would
probably be with w@v@u instead of with [:w[:v u).
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:06 AM David Lambert wrote:
>
> Since we don't
Very neat!
R.E. Boss
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Programming
> Namens David Lambert
> Verzonden: woensdag 23 oktober 2019 16:06
> Aan: programming
> Onderwerp: [Jprogramming] monad chains
>
> Since we don't yet have
> w`v`u`:666 evaluates equi
Since we don't yet have
w`v`u`:666 evaluates equivalently as the train [: w [: v u
v&.:(u :.w) NB. a single verb
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
