3(***(***)(***))4
35831808
3((***))4
144
3(***(***)144"_)4
35831808
3(*)4
12
3(**12"_(***)144"_)4
35831808
12(***)144
2985984
3(**2985984"_)4
35831808
3(12"_*2985984"_)4
35831808
3((***)(***)***)4
429981696
3(144"_(***)144"_)4
429981696
/Erling
On 2014-07-20 02:49, Linda Alvord wrote:
Brian, I meant JHS (I went to Vineland High School or VHS and I guess my
fingers remembered)
I had a chance to experiment with:
9!:3]4
Once you set this in a terminal, any function that you name will give a tree
as it's default display until you change it or close the terminal.
Also load a new
3(f=:144"_(***)144"_)4
429981696
3 f 4
429981696
9!:3]4
f
┌─ 144
┌─ " ─┴─ _
│
│ ┌─ *
├─┼─ *
──┤ └─ *
│
│ ┌─ 144
└─ " ─┴─ _
Linda
-Original Message-
From: [email protected]
[m
Linda is using a verizon.net email address, so is probably not using
gmail, and probably not using a browser-based email address.
A quick web search suggests that verizon provides a simplified version
of microsoft exchange.
FYI,
--
Raul
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Brian Schott wrote:
>
I would explain it by quoting a few sentences from the dictionary
Execution proceeds from right to left, except that when a right parenthesis
is encountered... in an unparenthesized expression the right argument of
any verb is the result of the entire phrase to its right... The executions
in the s
This may also help show the evaluation more clearly:
nb =: (;:^:_1) @: (":&.>)
m=: 4 : 'x*y[smoutput nb y;''*'';x'
3 (m m m (m m m) m m m) 4
4 * 3
4 * 3
12 * 12
4 * 3
144 * 12
144 * 12
1728 * 1728
4 * 3
2985984 * 12
35831808
3 ((m m m) (m m m) m m m) 4
4 * 3
4 * 3
12 * 12
4 * 3
4 * 3
12 * 12
14
Yes, well, the trace:
trace'3(***(***)(***))4'
--- 5 Trident
*
*
*
* * *
--- 8 Paren --
(
* * *
)
* * *
--- 5 Trident
*
*
*
* * *
--- 8 Paren --
(
* * *
)
* * *
--- 5 Trident
*
* * *
* *
That shows pretty clearly, in my opinion, which parenthesis are
redundant, and why.
You'd need to compare it with the trace of the other expression to see
the difference, of course.
That said, Joe Bogner's post on how to see the intermediate results
during an execution of that train gives another
The dictionary is famous (or infamous, depending on one's point of view)
for its terseness:
"
A train of two or three verbs produces a verb and (by repeated resolution),
a verb train of any length also produces a verb. For example, the trains
+-*% and +-*%^ are equivalent to +(-*%) and +-(*%^).
"
This trace adds some clarity, too.
trace'3(+*-(*+-)(+-*))4'
--- 5 Trident
+
-
*
+ - *
--- 8 Paren --
(
+ - *
)
+ - *
--- 5 Trident
*
+
-
* + -
--- 8 Paren --
(
* + -
)
* + -
--- 5 Trident
-
Trying to figure out how to prevent the ijx window from appearing for
making standalone applications. I found an example in Wiki Guides/ J8
Standalone. But the zip file of the project build for the application
missing -(http://www.mcardle.wisc.edu/mprime/download/viewer-1.zip).
I downloaded the in
"It's déjà vu all over again." :)
(
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2009-December/017478.html
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2009-December/017480.html
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2009-December/017482.html
)
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Erling
I assume you've already found the qt demo that describes show/hide behaviour.
"I could put "exit 0" in a close event for
the form, but that doesn't seem like a good way to solve the problem. "
Its a good way if you have a main form that launches all others, and so can
quit all other forms.
If
Didn't we finish this thread? How about a new thread, possibly with
summaries from earlier discussions? This thread was only about indexed
replacement and Amend? /Erling
On 2014-07-20 21:17, Jose Mario Quintana wrote:
"It's déjà vu all over again." :)
(
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/pr
Sorry, I'm working on updating that guide and will have the files uploaded
within a few days. Jqt has changed significantly since that guide was written.
> On Jul 20, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Don Guinn wrote:
>
> Trying to figure out how to prevent the ijx window from appearing for
> making standalone
Yes, I could run my apps from the IDE window, but many times it is nice to
just have the app be a link on the screen. And distributed apps could be
run from the IDE as well, but it is nice that the IDE doesn't pop up
showing that the app is written in J. Make an app written in J look no
different t
Yes, I noticed that a lot had changed when I compared the library scripts
in your viewer.ijs and the ones in the current J library.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Norman Drinkwater
wrote:
> Sorry, I'm working on updating that guide and will have the files uploaded
> within a few days. Jqt has
I cannot imagine either what that business might be. Neither I can find
any warning in the dictionary justifying this behavior. On the contrary:
"If n is negative, the *obverse* u^:_1 (see below) is applied |n times."
( http://jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d202n.htm )
There are potential adverse
I was on vacation eating and drinking at street side stands in Mexico City
and sun bathing on the Mayan Riviera. I am sorry. Nah, I am not.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Erling Hellenäs
wrote:
> Didn't we finish this thread? How about a new thread, possibly with
> summaries from earlier di
> ...pops up when the form is closed. I could put "exit 0" in a close event
for the form, but that doesn't seem like a good way to solve the problem.
J6 had an option that when the last window closed J closed. That doesn't
seem to be J8 works.
Right now you have to use "exit 0" at the end. This wa
OK. Thanks.
What about "fixed" as in:
cc editname edit;set editname fixed 60;
Is it supposed to be gone or did it get accidently dropped?
What does (wd 'smact') do?
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 3:26 PM, chris burke wrote:
> > ...pops up when the form is closed. I could put "exit 0" in a close ev
smact is used inside labs to transfer focus back to term after creating a
new form. This is just for convenience and not mandatory so that the cmd
may be dropped.
On Jul 21, 2014 5:32 AM, "Don Guinn" wrote:
> OK. Thanks.
>
> What about "fixed" as in:
> cc editname edit;set editname fixed 60;
>
Yes, I see how it can be quite useful. I tried it with a form. There is a
similar situation where doing a Find, say in the edit window, that one has
to select back to the edit window very carefully to get the found string to
be highlighted. The edit form needs a similar tool.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014
23 matches
Mail list logo
