Re: [Jprogramming] Derivatives

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:12 PM Don Kelly wrote: > I also should have written "indeterminate" This seems to be another example where one choice being valid does not mean that a different choice is invalid. (A common issue when using the english language -- or, more generally, any human language.

Re: [Jprogramming] Derivatives

I am skeptical of this particular use of "indeterminant" in Falkoff's *APL\360 History*. I typed in the web page http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/apl360history.htm contents from a printed Proceedings, and as noted in the web page, The Proceedings state that “Mr. Falkoff’s [address] … has been tran

Re: [Jprogramming] Derivatives

Many thanks to both Raul and Roger for Falkoff's paper. Fascinating! > On Feb 11, 2020, at 11:49 AM, Roger Hui wrote: > > I am skeptical of this particular use of "indeterminant" in Falkoff's > *APL\360 > History*. I typed in the web page > http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/apl360history.htm co

[Jprogramming] Blush

And sincere apologies for forgetting to remove the original messages from my reply. -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

[Jprogramming] Reference to the old wd conjunction

viewmat.ijs in line 10 refers to (11!:0) when defining VIEWMATGUI. That conjunction has been removed from J9. -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Re: [Jprogramming] Reference to the old wd conjunction

11!:0 is still alive and used in jandroid and jnet. On Wed, Feb 12, 2020, 2:30 AM Don Guinn wrote: > viewmat.ijs in line 10 refers to (11!:0) when defining VIEWMATGUI. That > conjunction has been removed from J9. > -- > For info