[Jprogramming] conew alteration?

2020-07-15 Thread David Lambert
I need an object to create an instance of same class. Solution, unbox and re-box value conew 0 {:: coname'' Is this a common need? Does putting boxopen into conew break code? If not, we could use value conew coname'' conew=: 3 : 0 c=. boxopen y NB. was c=. http://www.jsoftware.com/f

Re: [Jprogramming] "Lazy evaluation" of verbs in

2020-07-15 Thread ethiejiesa via Programming
Responding to you with a good bit of lag: > > My first approach was to "lazy load" by making all p1, p2, etc. strings > > and > > evaluating with > > > > 0!:111 ".&> (#~ 0 = 4!:0) 'p'&,&.> ARGV > > > > However, this strikes me as a bit ugly. It also makes it a bit awkward > > to > > invest

Re: [Jprogramming] "Lazy evaluation" of verbs in

2020-07-15 Thread ethiejiesa via Programming
Interesting. Your parallel jconsole ideas address a case I hadn't considered yet---outputting the answers to many expensive computations. Thank you for the zeromq pointer! bill lam wrote: > This is a good suggestion. The zeromq addon can run multiple jconsole > instances in parallel. > > On Fri