Sophie Gautier wrote:
If it's only the development of the tool, it should be placed under the
LibreOffice Wiki section I think:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/LibreOfficeWiki
Later, the tool itself, if it must be visible when arriving on the wiki,
the Start page is the best to place
Gianluca Turconi wrote:
2) more info about the "formal" approval/rejection of the proposal. If
there is already a process, that's good. If there is not, we may create
it now.
I forgot writing that the process includes, for me, a longer open
discussion about the draft of the proposal. :)
Ciao
Hi Florian, *,
Florian Reisinger schrieb:
> Am 19.05.2011 02:59, schrieb Webmaster for Lungstrom.com:
[..]
>> Are we looking at end-of-June [or July] as a possible earliest
>> release of 3.4?
>> That would give a month or more for RC versions.
>> I just would like to start making plans for the
Am 19.05.2011 16:43, schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
Hi Florian, *,
Florian Reisinger schrieb:
[..]
Sorry I don't understand. How does this relate to Tim's DVD sheduling
You refer to??
Please consider practicing understandable quoting to save your coworkers
time and help them to understand Your
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is happy to announce the first release
candidate of LibreOffice 3.4. The upcoming 3.4 will be the second
major release of the LibreOffice project, and comes with many exciting
new features. Please be aware that LibreOffice 3.4 RC1 is not yet
ready for produc
