, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Sophie Gautier wrote:
If it's only the development of the tool, it should be placed under the
LibreOffice Wiki section I think:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/LibreOfficeWiki
Later, the tool itself, if it must be visible when arriving on the
wiki,
the Start
Gianluca Turconi wrote:
2) more info about the formal approval/rejection of the proposal. If
there is already a process, that's good. If there is not, we may create
it now.
I forgot writing that the process includes, for me, a longer open
discussion about the draft of the proposal. :)
Ciao
Sophie Gautier wrote:
A wiki is done to handle mistakes by design: you can always undo your
final action :)
If it's only the development of the tool, it should be placed under the
LibreOffice Wiki section I think:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/LibreOfficeWiki
Later, the tool itself,
Sophie Gautier wrote:
I'm not sure you will have feedback before having done something, see
we're only two in the conversation for now. So lets implement a first
draft and a description of the process, we may get more feedback later.
OK, no problem.
So let's refine what we were discussing so
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
So, I find this to be a very good idea:-) What should be done, at this
stage? Write a proposal on the wiki? discuss it here? It obviously needs to
go somewhere:)
I've just sent a more detailed work flow idea in another message.
Please, have a look at it.
Regards,
Sophie Gautier wrote:
Yes. I'm more for a wiki than a bugzilla, unless you know one that has a
very nice interface and is not frightening for non technical contributors.
Sincerely, I hate bugzilla. :)
For non technical people it's a real barrier for contribution, IMO.
However, summing up
