Sama Alexander manyun
Sama Silk Road manyun
Sekarang sama bung ajeg jontor
-----Original Message-----
From: ajeg <ajegil...@yahoo.com>
Sender: proletar@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:44:55
To: proletar@yahoogroups.com<proletar@yahoogroups.com>
Reply-To: proletar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [proletar] Paus tidak mengritik Islam Re: Paus mengritik Islam
terang bulan terang di kali
buaya timbul disangka prawan suci
Seperti biasa, dengan tutur kata yang rapi bak sisiran
rambut Harmoko, si geboy gigih menipu dirinya sendiri.
Sepintas, kata-katanya yang mengakui Paus Benediktus XVI
DIPROTES keras lantaran (katanya) mengritik Islam, mau
menggambarkan posisi geboy yang fair menyikapi "kritik"
umat Islam terhadap Paus.
Padahal, kalau dia berakal mustinya bertanya-tanya, kok Paus
cuma diprotes keras oleh umat Islam?
Kenapa bukan pecah perang salib? Atau muncul huru-hara
macam kasus film & kartun Muhammad? Yah sekurangnya-kurangnya
di"Salman Rushdi"kan kek, si Paus itu. Kenapa kok cuma
diprotes keras? Malah apa yang dia sebut protes keras itu pun
kenapa tidak terpublikasi secara luas?
Dari sini saja sudah tergambar dengan jelas kualitas si geboy
dalam melihat persoalan.
Tapi, lebih jauh lagi, ini justru membuktikan dengan gamblang
bagaimana sesungguhnya umat Islam memandang dunia. Maksudnya,
orang dengan cara pandang manusia biasa pasti percaya bahwa
diskusi dengan landasan kemanusiaan bakal melahirkan pemahaman
yang sama.
Sebagai contoh, manusia biasa akan melihat pidato Paus di aula
Universitas Regensburg itu sebagai ceramah dari seorang profesor
belaka. Profesor yang sedang bergembira mendapatkan kesempatan
untuk berceramah di podium kampus lagi. Sebab, dalam ceramah itu
Paus membuka dengan celoteh tentang kenangan manisnya ketika
mengajar di Universitas Bonn.
Jadi, sangat penting bagi kita untuk memandang Paus di podium
kampus itu sebagai seorang profesor. Profesor yang melakukan
pendekatan terhadap masalah (dhi, Islam) dengan metode ajakan
mencari tahu, dan bukan dengan petentengan sok tahu.
Ini bisa dilihat dari isi ceramahnya yang bagi umat Islam
mengandung "kelucuan". Lucu karena ketidakpahamannya,
ketidaktahuannya, dan bukan sengaja melucu untuk membungkus
satir apalagi kritik.
Di antara kelucuan itu ialah (kita anggap geboy punya transkrip
ceramah tsb), Paus Benediktus XVI menyebut QS 2:256 (tentang
tidak ada paksaan dalam beragama) sebagai ayat yang dirilis pada
periode awal kerasulan Muhammad. "When Mohammed was still powerless
and under threat," demikian kata Paus.
Umat Islam segera maklum, Paus pasti terkecoh dengan nomor
punggung "2" yang dikenakan Surat Al-Baqarah itu. Sehingga wajar
kalau dia menyangka QS 2:256 itu terbit di awal kerasulan Muhammad.
Padahal, siapa pun yang pernah buka Al-qur'an pasti tau bahwa
Surat Al-Baqarah tergolong surat Madaniyah; surat yang diturunkan
di episode setelah Muhammad hijrah ke Madinah.
Artinya, QS 2:256 itu turun justru di saat posisi Muhammad dan
pengikutnya sangat kuat, karena harus menertibkan situasi Madinah
yang kacau oleh pertikaian Arab (bukan Islam) vs Yahudi kaki-
tangan Bizantium / Romawi Timur.
Konteks penyebutan QS 2:256 dalam ceramah itu adalah sebagai
tanggapan Paus atas pernyataan Manuel II Paleologus (Kaisar
Bizantium) yang dipajang si geboy di awal joget stripteasenya
di bawah itu ("Show me just what Muhammad brought blabla...").
Dalam ceramah itu Paus menyebut pernyataan si Manuel II (tolong
dibedakan dengan pelem emmanuelle-2, sylvia kristel) sebagai
"a brusqueness that we find unacceptable, on the central question
about the relationship between religion and violence in general."
Jelas dan gamblang, bahwa ceramah Paus Benediktus XVI di
Regensburg itu justru mengritik bacotannya si Manuel II (non
kristel).
Jadi, bukan, samasekali bukan, mengritik Islam sebagaimana
cuwawakannya si geboy tralala yang rupanya tidak membaca artikel
yang dikirimnya sendiri itu, yang sudah menjelaskan bahwa Paus
tidak mendukung maupun mengutuk pernyataan si Manuel II, selain
menyebutnya sebagai "a brusqueness" dalam hubungan antaragama.
Dalam bahasa akademiknya, ceramah Paus Benediktus itu jelas
masuk kategori pendekatan masalah dengan pertanyaan / ajakan
yang diajukan secara diplomatis.
Faktanya, ceramah itu ikut membuat kunjungan bersejarah Paus
ke Turki (dua bulan kemudian) semakin mulus, lancar, tanpa gangguan
samasekali, kecuali justru mengundang dengung di lorong-lorong
Basilika St. Peter's.
Nah, sekalipun kali ini si geboy tidak cuwawakan soal sex ("cabut-
jangan.." dll), tapi kegatelannya seperti yang dulu. Masih belom
belajar menahan diri untuk tidak nyopotin beha & celdam di muka umum.
Atau jangan-jangan situ juga mengidap OCD, boy?
--- Gabriella Rantau <gkrantau@...> wrote:
> Beberapa waktu lalu Grek dlm postingnya yg berjudul Paus Masuk
> Islam dan disertai himbauan agar yg membaca menyebar luaskan klaim
> orang2 dungu bhw Pope Benedict mengundurkan diri dan masuk Islam.
>
> Untuk keseimbangan pendapat aku sertakan artikel mengenai pidato
> Paus Benedict yg DIPROTES keras oleh umat Islam karena beliau dlm
> pidatonya mengritik Islam. Yg ingin lebih banyak membaca ttg
> pendapat dia mengenai Islam aku anjurkan untuk click 'Pope
> Benedict's speech on Islam' atau 'Pope Benedict's criticism of
> Islam'
>
> Gabriella
>
> POPE BENEDICT CRITICIZES ISLAM
> (Artinya dia tidak menjadi mualaf)
>
> "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was
> new, and thereyou will find things only evil and inhuman, such as
> his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."
> These words, expressed six centuries ago by a Byzantine emperor,
> Manuel II Paleologus, in dialogue with an Iranian scholar, spur
> three reflections.
> Pope Benedict XVI offered the above quote, neither endorsing nor
> condemning it, in his academic speech, "Faith, Reason and the
> University: Memories and Reflections," delivered in German last
> week in Germany. It served to introduce his erudite critique of the
> Western concept of reason since the Enlightenment.
> But did he have other purposes? The head of the Benedictine order,
> Abbot Notker Wolf, understood the pope's quote as "a blatant
> allusion to [Iran's President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad." Vatican
> insiders told the LondonSunday Times that Benedict "was trying to
> pre-empt an aggressive letter aimed at the papacy by the president
> of Iran, which was why he cited the debate involving a Persian."
> First reflection: Benedict has offered elusive comments, brief
> statements, and now this delphic quotation, but he has not provided
> a much-needed major statement on this vital topic of Islam. One
> hopes it is in the offing.
> Whatever the pope's purpose, he prompted the near-predictable furor
> in the Muslim world.
> Religious and political authorities widely condemned the speech,
> with some calling for violence.
>
> * In Britain, while leading a rally outside Westminster
> Cathedral, Anjem Choudary of Al-Ghurabaa called for the pope "to be
> subject to capital punishment."
> * In Iraq, the Mujahideen's Army threatened to "smash the
> crosses in the house of the dog from Rome" and other groups made
> blood-curdling threats.
> * In Kuwait, an important website called for violent
> retribution against Catholics.
> * In Somalia, the religious leader Abubukar Hassan Malin
> urged Muslims to "hunt down" the pope and kill him "on the spot."
> * In India, a leading imam, Syed Ahmed Bukhari, called on
> Muslims to "respond in a manner which forces the pope to
> apologise."
> * A top Al-Qaeda figure announced that "the infidelity and
> tyranny of the pope will only be stopped by a major attack."
> The Vatican responded by establishing an extraordinary and
> unprecedented security cordon around the pope. Further away, the
> incitement spurred some violence, with more likely on the way.
> Seven churches were attacked in the West Bank and Gaza, one in
> Basra, Iraq (prompting this ironic headline at the "RedState" blog:
> "Pope implies Islam a violent religion ... Muslims bomb churches").
> The murder of an Italian nun in Somalia and two Assyrians in Iraq
> also appear connected.
> Second reflection: this new round of Muslim outrage, violence, and
> murder has a by-now routine quality. Earlier versions occurred in
> 1989 (in response to Salman Rushdie's novel, The Satanic Verses),
> 1997 (when the U.S. Supreme Court did not take down a representation
> of Muhammad), 2002 (when Jerry Falwell called Muhammad a
> terrorist), 2005 (the fraudulent Koran-flushing episode), and
> February 2006 (the Danish cartoon incident).
> Vatican leaders tried to defuse the pope's quote, as well as his
> condemnation of jihad (holy war). The papal spokesman, Federico
> Lombardi, S.J., said Benedict did not intend to give "an
> interpretation of Islam as violent. … inside Islam there are many
> different positions and there are many positions that are not
> violent." Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the secretary of state,
> indicated that the pope "sincerely regrets that certain passages of
> his address could have sounded offensive to the sensitivities of
> the Muslim faithful."
> Then, in what may be an unprecedented step by a pope, Benedict
> himself proffered the sort of semi-apology often favored by those
> feeling the heat. "I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some
> countries to a few passages of my address," reads the official
> Vatican translation into English, "which were considered offensive
> to the sensibility of Muslims.
> These in fact were a quotation from a medieval text, which do not
> in any way express my personal thought."
> In the Italian original, however, Benedict says only sono
> rammaricato, which translates as "I am disappointed" or "I regret."
> Third reflection: the Muslim uproar has a goal: to prohibit
> criticism of Islam by Christians and thereby to impose Shariah
> norms on the West. Should Westerners accept this central tenet of
> Islamic law, others will surely follow.
> Retaining free speech about Islam, therefore, represents a critical
> defense against the imposition of an Islamic order.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Post message: prole...@egroups.com
Subscribe : proletar-subscr...@egroups.com
Unsubscribe : proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com
List owner : proletar-ow...@egroups.com
Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com
proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
