+1 for distroless. On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 3:03 PM Bjoern Rabenstein <bjo...@rabenste.in> wrote:
> On 31.01.21 17:32, Ben Kochie wrote: > > Another option is we could fully build our own busybox binary, with the > > necessary fixes. > > > > I'm somewhat in favor of going distroless. With a large number of users > > using our container images in Kubernetes, it's less necessary to include > > busybox, as they can attach userspace sidecar containers. > > I guess distroless would also simplify the question of how to include > all required licenses, simply by requiring a whole lot less of them. > > -- > Björn Rabenstein > [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03 > [email] bjo...@rabenste.in > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Prometheus Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to prometheus-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/20210201140259.GE3906%40jahnn > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to prometheus-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CA%2BT6YoyjUG-Gh6QyFhTCYW-8wZ-wud3HqGc1mn7W8cm3ojQmcw%40mail.gmail.com.
