Thanks a ton, Julien!
I've triped over this
https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/blob/00f16d1ac3a4c94561e5133b821d8e4d9ef78ec2/documentation/examples/prometheus-digitalocean.yml#L25
I replaced [] with [] when in fact I should have changed [$1] to ${1}
Thanks for the targets page hint anywa
On 08 Nov 13:33, Victor Ivanov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Is there a way to see th final adderss value that prometheus will use to
> talk to the instance?
>
> I tried using DigitalOcean SD with additional relabelling
>
> ```
> relabel_configs:
> - source_labels: [__meta_digitalocean_private_i
Hello!
Is there a way to see th final adderss value that prometheus will use to
talk to the instance?
I tried using DigitalOcean SD with additional relabelling
```
relabel_configs:
- source_labels: [__meta_digitalocean_private_ipv4]
regex: '(10\.133\.\d+\.\d+)'
target_label:
@nandee...@gmail.com, if you can gather stuff like logs and maybe a
snapshot of the data around the time the OOM kill occurs consider opening a
ticket on GitHub
nandee...@gmail.com schrieb am Mittwoch, 4. November 2020 um 14:50:39 UTC+1:
> Hi Team,
>
> Can anybody help here, because of the spike
How long do you usually wait before restarting the Prometheus process?
https://www.robustperception.io/debugging-out-of-order-samples
There are a couple of different possible root cause so I'm 100% sure which
one you are hitting. Prometheus itself might not pick up the time change to
the correct
That question is out of scope for this mailing list, which is about
prometheus.
Le dim. 8 nov. 2020 à 07:19, kiran a écrit :
> All,
>
> I have custom data(coming form an API request) in json format and trying
> to push to victoria metrics without prometheus, but looking for an easy and
> efficie
Hi All,
I am trying to install prometheus via Gitlab managed apps to monitor my
micro k8s cluster on an ubuntu VM
Unfortunately I have met the permission issues. Went through multiple
forums and set my folder (/var/opt/gitlab/prometheus/data) to full
permission (777). However, I still get the
On Sunday, 8 November 2020 12:10:54 UTC, Yagyansh S. Kumar wrote:
>
> I'll try and get a backtrace and post it here.
>
> But still the question remains, is BBE is returning probe_success 0, why
> is it doing only for 2.20.1 🙄.
>
>
It could be that 2.12 is missing the data point (scrape) entirely.
I'll try and get a backtrace and post it here.
But still the question remains, is BBE is returning probe_success 0, why is
it doing only for 2.20.1 🙄.
On Sat, 7 Nov, 2020, 11:33 pm Brian Candler, wrote:
> I don't think it's a false alert. If it's the rule you showed, then the
> only way you
9 matches
Mail list logo
