It seems like you are federating through an ingress or load balancer that
balances over multiple Prometheus server replicas. Either federate from
each separately, or make sure that you only get responses from one
consistently.
As an alternative to the global federation, consider Thanos, it scales
Thanks for your observations.
I tried the approach you suggested but I am not getting the expected result
which is an incremental counter. I see the results incrementing when is
less than 98 but I also see decreasing result sometimes when is not less
than 98. It does not make any sense to me.
Hi,
There are at least a couple of things off in that query:
* http_service_api looks like it's probably a counter metric (although it
doesn't have a "_total" suffix), so you need to apply rate() to it first,
before applying a sum(). Otherwise you are looking at the absolute value of
the
HI,
I am not able to make this query to work precise enough. Hopefully, someone
can help me out.
This Query works fine. It returns 1 if the result is less than 98
100*sum(http_service_api{apiCode="0"}) by (method) / ignoring (apiCode)
group_left() sum(http_service_api{} ) by (method) < bool
Hi team
Let we take an example like cluster A and cluster B here services x is
running on A unfortunately it went don't in A automatically it will Up in B
so here how do I get metrics from both clusters in a single Prometheus.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
generetaor parse_errors gives me the same output as generate.
sup...@gmail.com schrieb am Freitag, 23. April 2021 um 12:09:51 UTC+2:
> Did you run "generator parse_errors" to validate parsing of all MIBs?
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:38 AM 'Thorben Köller' via Prometheus Users <
>
Did you run "generator parse_errors" to validate parsing of all MIBs?
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:38 AM 'Thorben Köller' via Prometheus Users <
prometheus-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Update: I would rule out any significant problems with the MIBs. I have
> once more rechecked that all
Update: I would rule out any significant problems with the MIBs. I have
once more rechecked that all required MIBs are present with fitting names
and snmptranslate works fine for "non standard" MIBs.
Do you have another idea, what I could check?
Thorben Köller schrieb am Freitag, 23. April 2021
Ok, I have made no progress so far (copied the files to relevant
directories). But just for clarification: this is rather a problem with the
MIBs than the snmp exporter generator, isn't it?
sup...@gmail.com schrieb am Montag, 19. April 2021 um 14:44:32 UTC+2:
> As you can see by the original
9 matches
Mail list logo