Re: [prometheus-users] Able to specify bind port, but not address

2020-08-10 Thread jumble
Christian, Thanks for your response! After a second look, the perceived bug was actually a combination of two non-Prometheus issues: - Other firewall rules were preventing connections to port 9090. - I misread netstat's output- Prometheus was binding to port 9090 for all IPv6 addresses and _imp

Re: [prometheus-users] Able to specify bind port, but not address

2020-08-05 Thread Christian Hoffmann
Hi, On 8/4/20 3:23 PM, jumble wrote: > Latest prometheus, on RHEL8. > > Observed behavior: bound to |127.0.0.1:9090| This sounds unexpected. Are you using the official binaries from prometheus.io / github? Can you share the exact logs from your experiments? Is it possible that you've got multi

[prometheus-users] Able to specify bind port, but not address

2020-08-04 Thread jumble
Latest prometheus, on RHEL8. Tried command: ./prometheus Expected behavior: bind to 0.0.0.0:9090 Observed behavior: bound to 127.0.0.1:9090 Tried command: ./prometheus --web.listen-address=0.0.0.0:9090 Expected behavior: bind to 0.0.0.0:9090 Observed behavior: bound to 127.0.0.1:9090 Tried