Re: [ProofPower] Test

2023-11-07 Thread Mark Adams
Hello Rob, I'm still here! Mark. On 06/11/2023 00:54, Rob Arthan wrote: This is an attempt to investigate what happened to the ProofPower mailing list and to see if I can bring it back to life. If you get this message please reply. Best regards, Rob.

Re: [ProofPower] Test

2023-11-07 Thread Jon Lockhart
I got the email! Regards, Jon Lockhart On Mon, Nov 6, 2023, 6:25 PM Phil Clayton wrote: > Received! (By both my email addresses - it seems I am doubly subscribed!) > > Phil > > On 06/11/2023 00:54, Rob Arthan wrote: > > This is an attempt to investigate what happened to the ProofPower > mailin

Re: [ProofPower] "Unicode" vs. UTF8

2023-11-07 Thread Roger Bishop Jones
On 07/11/2023 10:09, Makarius wrote: I first heard of "Unicode" approx. 1990. Everybody was talking about "wide charaters" (16bit) and made moves to support them (e.g. major Unix vendors and MicroSoft). That was the time of now obsolete UCS16: "16bit should be sufficient for everyone, i.e. ever

Re: [ProofPower] "Unicode" vs. UTF8

2023-11-07 Thread Makarius
On 06/11/2023 02:19, Rob Arthan wrote: One bit of burrowing inside instigated by the developers rather than the users began a few years ago: an experimental port of ProofPower to use Unicode and UTF-8 for mathematical symbols in place of the ad hoc character set that we had to invent for ours