Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-03-01 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 09:50 AM 3/1/2002 +, Steve Wiseman wrote: >On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > > > I tested what I wrote before mailing it. I can only think of these > > possibilities: (1) Mr. Wiseman does not understand what was written and is > > therefore referring to some other command s

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-03-01 Thread Steve Wiseman
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > I tested what I wrote before mailing it. I can only think of these > possibilities: (1) Mr. Wiseman does not understand what was written and is > therefore referring to some other command sequence, (2) his memory is > simply faulty and he has not

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-03-01 Thread Steve Wiseman
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Ian Wilson wrote: > I have updated the Bug List to include this problem as an update to that > reported by Brad V. (Polygons pouring over entities that once had a > net). It would seem to be the same problem. Ah - I've just been and read that thread - it does seem to have

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-02-28 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 11:33 AM 2/28/2002 -0800, Dwight wrote: >Steve is right. There's definitely a problem with tracks that had a net, >and then had all attached pads removed, and updated via "Update Free >Primitives from Component Pads". As you run the cursor over them, the >status bar still shows the old net.

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-02-28 Thread Ian Wilson
On 11:33 AM 28/02/02 -0800, Dwight said: >Steve is right. There's definitely a problem with tracks that had a net, >and then had all attached pads removed, and updated via "Update Free >Primitives from Component Pads". As you run the cursor over them, the >status bar still shows the old net. An

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-02-28 Thread Dwight
Steve is right. There's definitely a problem with tracks that had a net, and then had all attached pads removed, and updated via "Update Free Primitives from Component Pads". As you run the cursor over them, the status bar still shows the old net. And even though the Properties dialog shows "No

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-02-28 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 02:10 PM 2/28/2002 +, Steve Wiseman wrote: >On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: >ress the Global button. Under Attributes to Match By, select "same." Under > > layer, you might want to select "same" as well. Click on the Selection box, > > then click on okay. All top layer no-n

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-02-28 Thread Brad Velander
ry 28, 2002 6:10 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features? Nope. Really, no. It doesn't. It selects the connected copper, _not_ all no-net tracks. (or it might be remembering a net-name from ages ago, or almost anything. What it doesn't do is w

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-02-28 Thread Steve Wiseman
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > Here is what Mr. Reagan was talking about. Double-click on a no-net track > that is, say, on the top layer. If you don't have a no-net, just put a > piece of top layer track down, it will automatically be no-net unless it > touches a real net. Y

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-02-27 Thread Dennis Saputelli
we recently deleted all the unused vias and stringer tracks on BGAs by unlocking comp primitives, selecting one via and track and global copying selection to all NO NETS hit ctrl-delete and they were all gone worked fine don't know about other uses (or more specifically failures) of NO NET selecti

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-02-27 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 07:22 PM 2/27/2002 +, Steve Wiseman wrote: >On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Mike Reagan wrote: > > > Yes you can select "no net" traces, vias and object gloabaly > >It doesn't seem to work, though... at best, I get all the features that >were on the same net, or maybe that are touching... Other "no ne

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-02-27 Thread Mike Reagan
2002 2:22 PM Subject: Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features? > On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Mike Reagan wrote: > > > Yes you can select "no net" traces, vias and object gloabaly > > It doesn't seem to work, though... at best, I get all the features that > were on the s

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-02-27 Thread Steve Wiseman
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Mike Reagan wrote: > Yes you can select "no net" traces, vias and object gloabaly It doesn't seem to work, though... at best, I get all the features that were on the same net, or maybe that are touching... Other "no net" features aren't matched - I'm confused. Steve * * *

Re: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-02-27 Thread Mike Reagan
Yes you can select "no net" traces, vias and object gloabaly Mike Reagan EDSI - Original Message - From: Steve Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:51 AM Subject: [PEDA] Operations on no-net features? > >

[PEDA] Operations on no-net features?

2002-02-27 Thread Steve Wiseman
Hi, all... since "No Net" seems to be treated like any other net name, does anyone know if I can do global ops on "No Net" features? (f'rinstance, select and delete them). I'm hoping this is just something obvious that I'm missing! I guess this is a similar request to having 'error' as a s