> What's your point? That people should be diplomatic no matter what? Yeah, > right. Diplomacy is a two way street buddy. I have no patience with people > who spout off unsubstatiated, illogical, and incorrect garbage, reagrdless > of whether it offends the ears or eyes of the current priveledged class.
aj, how can you stand living in this world? ;-) My thoughts: 1) The world is full of people like you described. 2) Some of these people are "full-time propagators" of their own brand of BS. 3) Usually BS is said to advance the cause of a priveledged class, not in opposition to it. 4) Most of us have been at least a "part-time propagator" of our own brand of BS at some point in our lives ;-) 5) The priveledged class always consists of "other people", not oneself ;-) I enjoy fictional stories about people who always see things through their own preconceived notions. The movie "Being There" and the novel "A Confederacy of Dunces" are 2 of my favorite illustrations of this. Best regards, Ivan Baggett Bagotronix Inc. website: www.bagotronix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:51 AM Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel EDA Forum... was adjacent component placeme nt D XP > What's your point? That people should be diplomatic no matter what? Yeah, > right. Diplomacy is a two way street buddy. I have no patience with people > who spout off unsubstatiated, illogical, and incorrect garbage, reagrdless > of whether it offends the ears or eyes of the current priveledged class. I > find it darkly humorous that most of you people who instinctively rally for > blind diplomacy are those who > a) are generally overpaid, > b) are secretly worried that the rest of society around them will discover > how much of a gravy train they're riding > c) will generally overlook any deceptive remarks made by others if it suits > their purposes > d) always have subtle "diplomatic" methods of imbuing the world with their > own forms of poison. > > Finally, I'll note that your own "contribution" to the thread consisted of > little more than an attack on me, with no mention of the fact that Peter > Morgan was wrong in his authoritative statement about the purpose of this > group. > (See items "c" and "d" above) > > Pot.Kettle.Black > > aj > > Clearly we do not share the same vision of what constitutes open, honest > communication. If that means I am not part of your community, then thank > God. > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
