On 11/23/2010 2:18 PM, joel falcou wrote:
> On 23/11/10 17:20, Eric Niebler wrote:
>> On 11/23/2010 10:19 AM, Joel Falcou wrote:
>>> So, question is: is there a way to have an extensible list of
>>> when that can be extended "from the outside", something
>>> like a proto::switch_ but with patterns
On 23/11/10 17:20, Eric Niebler wrote:
On 11/23/2010 10:19 AM, Joel Falcou wrote:
So, question is: is there a way to have an extensible list of
when that can be extended "from the outside", something
like a proto::switch_ but with patterns instead of tag ?
No. The best you can do is document h
On 11/23/2010 10:19 AM, Joel Falcou wrote:
> So, question is: is there a way to have an extensible list of
> when that can be extended "from the outside", something
> like a proto::switch_ but with patterns instead of tag ?
No. The best you can do is document how to define a new Proto algorithm
fr
Here is some classical pattern matching using proto::or_
https://gist.github.com/711891
This is pretty canonical I guess (unless my proto-fu is rusting).
As stated in the comments, my main concern is that adding new
pattern->value rules need to edit or_<>. Also classical.
For a long time it d
