I've put up 2.2.0rc2, same place:
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/files
2009/8/7 Kenton Varda
> Good points. I wasn't a big fan of this change in the first place but
> apparently it was a big performance win on Android (which does not have a
> very advanced garbage collector at the mome
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Scott Stafford wrote:
>
> Interesting... Are you using SWIG to wrap the C++?
No, straight C extensions. (SWIG is just a code generator that generates C
extensions.)
> Would you have to
> actually compile something to use a message in Python (god forbid)?
You
Interesting... Are you using SWIG to wrap the C++? Would you have to
actually compile something to use a message in Python (god forbid)?
Thinking about it a bit, I guess you'd just SWIG the static (non-
generated) interfaces and the Python classes would all operate
exclusively through reflection
Well, note that soon (hopefully in the next major release after 2.2.0 -- we
actually have someone actively working on it now) the Python implementation
will be able to wrap C++ classes for better performance. At that point it
will probably be easy to accomplish what you want by handing off most of
Hi -
We need DescriptorPool::BuildFile-like functionality in the protobuf
Python library. In other words, something that can take a
FileDescriptorProto object and create a bunch of
descriptor.Descriptor's that can be made into dynamic loaded
classes.
We haven't looked very closely at this probl
The groups people are working on fixing this.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Scott Stafford wrote:
>
> I'm having zero results too, searching for "DescriptorPool" for
> instance.
>
> On Aug 4, 7:54 pm, Kenton Varda wrote:
> > Interesting. I'll file a bug against google groups.
> >
> >
> >
> >
I'm having zero results too, searching for "DescriptorPool" for
instance.
On Aug 4, 7:54 pm, Kenton Varda wrote:
> Interesting. I'll file a bug against google groups.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Adam wrote:
>
> > On Aug 4, 5:16 pm, Kenton Varda wrote:
> > > What were you searching
Good points. I wasn't a big fan of this change in the first place but
apparently it was a big performance win on Android (which does not have a
very advanced garbage collector at the moment). I guess we should make it
optional, off-by-default. I'll make that change today and try to get
another r
Kenton Varda wrote:
> What kind of issues?
Unless the ThreadLocals are explicitly cleared, the classloader can not be
unloaded/GCed and jars redeployed. The retained memory is not so much an
issue for protobuf, but other people have not been so lucky and ended up
with leaks of many megabytes of r
Have you tried using the overload of parseFrom which takes an
extension registry?
Make sure you register all the extensions first, of course - call the
appropriate registerAllExtensions static method, passing in the
extension registry, before calling parseFrom(src.toByteArray(),
registry).
Jon
-
Protobuf 2.1.0 throws NPE when you try to set a field to null. So, this has
been long fixed.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Brice Figureau
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Oops, sorry, I was plain wrong.
> It turns out the code was setting the nonce parameter to null.
> Anyway, maybe it should be necessar
What kind of issues?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Holger Hoffstaette <
holger.hoffstae...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:50:57 -0700, Kenton Varda wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/files Please test it out and let
> > me know if you have any problems.
> >
Hi,
See below for more information.
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 16:58 +0200, Brice Figureau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using Protobuf 2.1 with the following proto file:
>
> message Message {
> enum Type {
> AUTH = 100;
> }
>
> required Type type = 1;
> optional int32 id
Hi,
Using Protobuf 2.1 with the following proto file:
message Message {
enum Type {
AUTH = 100;
}
required Type type = 1;
optional int32 id = 2;
extensions 100 to max;
}
message AuthRequest {
extend Message {
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:50:57 -0700, Kenton Varda wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/files Please test it out and let
> me know if you have any problems.
>
> http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/CHANGES.txt
The new thread-local freelist will very likely create a number of issue
Hi,
Oops, sorry, I was plain wrong.
It turns out the code was setting the nonce parameter to null.
Anyway, maybe it should be necessary to change the TextFormat to better
deal with null fields?
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 12:07 +0200, Brice Figureau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following message, und
Hi,
I have the following message, under Protobuf 2.0.3:
message Message {
required string name = 1;
optional string nonce = 2;
}
When I call toString() on this message it throws a NullPointerException:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.google.protobuf.
17 matches
Mail list logo
