Kenton,
I don't imagine this to be an option within TextFormatter. My
question should be reworded:
What is the lowest effort method to produce something similar to
relations within a currently defined TextFormatter ingest file? Would
it be to extend TextFormatter or create a preprocess
Anything with "internal" in the name may change in future releases, so you
should not rely on it. I will definitely be changing this because it's
supposed to be impossible to obtain a reference to a message that can still
be modified, which calling internalGetResult() would do. Also please assume
All implementations are advised to output tags in order by field number, in
which case they should all produce the same bytes... unless there are
unknown fields, which are always written at the end. In C++ you can use
DiscardUnknownFields() to make sure all unknown fields are discarded.
But I wo
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:36, maxwolf wrote:
> I wonder if protobuf messages are safe to be crypto signed?
If you just sign the content of a message, then this should be an
operation that should not require that a message is generated the same
for different implementations, right ? Meaning, you
Hello,
I wonder if protobuf messages are safe to be crypto signed? More
precisely - will certain message serialized from the same set of field
values be exactly the same for every platform/language?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers"
