eg.
message A {
string a; when set_a(), memory of a in heap(new/malloc)
int b; when set_b(), memory of b in stack
};
if defines many composite sub-class objects, a lot of time cost in new/
malloc. are you think so? or have a good idear for this?
--
You received this message because you a
One other thing to consider (if performance is not an issue) is to
extend Smooks (www.smooks.org). I have been considering this my self
although currently I do not have enough of a need to write this yet.
Basically you would write the Smooks "cartridge" to read a PB. You
can throw SAX events in co
No, the camel-case name is not stored anywhere. You will need to construct
it yourself. If performance is a concern, just cache the results in a
Map.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Sean Nguyen wrote:
> I am writing a utility base on your suggestion and I run into a
> problem of getting a cam
On Dec 27, 2010, at 4:43 , 飞 杨 wrote:
Does PrococolBuf support the above buffer function? if does, what
the code would be like...
I think what you are asking is to have a streaming protocol, where one
connection or file contains multiple protocol buffers?
http://code.google.com/apis/protoc
I am writing a utility base on your suggestion and I run into a
problem of getting a camel name out of a FieldDescriptor.
My proto message is like this:
message Person
{
optional string last_name = 1;
optional string first_name = 2;
}
When java object is generated it uses camel field name as
