On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Hitesh Jethwani wrote:
> > if on the stream writer, I add something like:
> > writer.write(new String(msg.getBytes(), "UTF8").getBytes()) instead of
> > simply writer.write(msg.getBytes()), I see the characters as expected
> > on the C++ client. However this I beli
> I was of the opinion that UTF8 encoding encodes each character using 8
> bits or a byte.
My understanding of UTF8 was clearly wrong. Just did some reading
again, it encodes characters in bytes, and can use upto 4 bytes to
represent a character.
> if on the stream writer, I add something like:
>
Thanks for pointing that out Evans.
> The Java protocol buffer API encodes strings as UTF-8. Since C++ has
> no unicode support, what you get on the other end is the raw UTF-8
> encoded data.
I was of the opinion that UTF8 encoding encodes each character using 8
bits or a byte. So not sure as to wh
Have you looked at http://code.google.com/p/protostuff?
It allows you to skip all the code generation and simply use your existing
classes (support for cyclic references too)
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Marco@worldcorp wrote:
> Hello
> i was wondering if protobuffer supports having an alre
They need to have exactly the same Descriptor object. When you create your
DynamicMessage from the DynamicMessageFactory, pass the Descriptor object
returned by the generated type's descriptor() or GetDescriptor() method.
Don't construct a separate Descriptor manually.
Of course, then the questi
When using non-ASCII characters, make sure you are using the "unicode" type,
not "str", to avoid any ambiguity in character encoding.
Also, I vaguely remember a bug fix related to this that is in version 2.4.0,
so you might try that.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Louhike wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm
I think if -lprotobuf wasn't found, the linker would complain about that
first, rather than complain about undefined references -- unless you have
some other libprotobuf in your library path which is being taken instead.
Maybe an older version?
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Jalitt wrote:
>
Actually version 2.4.0 has been uploaded and is in the file list, just
hasn't been marked "current" yet.
That said, note that using extend() on a repeated message makes deep copies
of all the message objects. Repeatedly calling add() is more efficient.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Ben Ford
Added to the wiki, thanks for contributing!
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:46 PM, wrote:
> I'm please to give the Ruby developers here Beefcake.
>
> https://github.com/bmizerany/beefcake/tree/master/lib/beefcake
>
> I would appreciate it if someone would list this on the ThirdPartyAddon
> page
> of
Are you looking for something more explicit than
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/reference/java/com/google/protobuf/MessageLite.Builder.html#mergeFrom(com.google.protobuf.CodedInputStream,
com.google.protobuf.ExtensionRegistryLite) ? Perhaps this isn't obvious
unless you know what
No, you cannot refer to arbitrary classes. Doing so would be difficult to
support across languages, and significantly complicates features like
reflection.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Marco@worldcorp wrote:
> Hello
> i was wondering if protobuffer supports having an already existing
> class
On Jan 25, 2011, at 15:27 , Hitesh Jethwani wrote:
As may be evident from above I am naive at Java and Protobuf. Any
help on this is appreciated.
The Java protocol buffer API encodes strings as UTF-8. Since C++ has
no unicode support, what you get on the other end is the raw UTF-8
encoded
We have a Java web server. When this sends some string, for instance,
É, this is received as multiple bytes on the C++ client end. As a
result something like SÉBASTIEN gets displayed like S<2 funny
characters>BASTIEN. What I assume is happening internally is that,
Java being UTF-16 by default, writ
Comment #9 on issue 158 by tj.rothw...@gmail.com: Push 2.3.0 maven artifact
to repo
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=158
It appears that 2.4.0's release beat the 2.3.0 push to Google's maven
repository.
http://code.google.com/p/google-maven-repository/source/browse/reposi
Hello
i was wondering if protobuffer supports having an already existing
class embedded in the message.
What i mean: from example i have seen, use writes a .proto buffer and
protobuffer generates all related java classes.
However, i have already existing classe which i'd like to embed in
a .pro
15 matches
Mail list logo
