[protobuf] Re: Issue 277 in protobuf: warning: [serial] serializable class has no definition of serialVersionUID

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: FixedIn-2.4.1 Comment #1 on issue 277 by liuj...@google.com: warning: [serial] serializable class has no definition of serialVersionUID http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=277 Fixed in r386 -- You received this message because you

[protobuf] Re: Issue 271 in protobuf: RPATH on python native library is not set correctly

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: FixedIn-2.4.1 Comment #3 on issue 271 by liuj...@google.com: RPATH on python native library is not set correctly http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=271 fixed in r388 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[protobuf] Re: Issue 259 in protobuf: extract_includes.bat doesn't copy plugin.h to include dir.

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: FixedIn-2.4.1 Comment #2 on issue 259 by liuj...@google.com: extract_includes.bat doesn't copy plugin.h to include dir. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=259 Fixed in r387 -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[protobuf] Re: Issue 275 in protobuf: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override

Comment #8 on issue 275 by the.real...@gmail.com: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=275 Well, setuptools handles the magic for you if you use it for the local installation. Conversely, if you use virtualenv, it'll

[protobuf] Re: Issue 275 in protobuf: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override

Comment #7 on issue 275 by zbe...@google.com: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=275 Thanks. This does not make me too happy, because it's quite a bit of magic associated with something as simple as overriding a syst

[protobuf] Re: Issue 275 in protobuf: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override

Comment #6 on issue 275 by the.real...@gmail.com: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=275 Ah. Based on this information, the problem is that your local install is *not* using setuptools for the install. As a result,

[protobuf] Re: Issue 281 in protobuf: python c++ implementation build fails with mingw32

Comment #2 on issue 281 by redaread...@gmail.com: python c++ implementation build fails with mingw32 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=281 hi, you are right, sysconfig.get_config_var("CC") return None but i can build other c extension as pyproj etc. with the same configurat

[protobuf] Re: mvn test failing

Thanks for the help. Your comment got me to look into the classpath issue a little more. I think I might know what the problem is. For some reason, my University's network filter refused to download the easy mock library, and so I had to download the jar file manually. I tried to install it wit

[protobuf] Re: Python Client: pickling error

Attaching python issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue8323 On Apr 28, 11:41 am, vish wrote: > What I did so far is to store byte content retrieved from wire onto > Queue itself, and later the consumer of that message is going to > construct an object out of it. > > On Apr 28, 11:12 am, Petar Petrov

[protobuf] Re: Python Client: pickling error

What I did so far is to store byte content retrieved from wire onto Queue itself, and later the consumer of that message is going to construct an object out of it. On Apr 28, 11:12 am, Petar Petrov wrote: > The multiprocessing queue uses pickle to serialize/deserialize the objects > before/after

Re: [protobuf] Re: Python Client: pickling error

The multiprocessing queue uses pickle to serialize/deserialize the objects before/after sending them between processes. Since the proto message contains a C extension class, it can't be serialized or deserialized with pickle. And it doesn't need to, just use the protobuf serialization/deserializat

[protobuf] Re: Issue 275 in protobuf: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override

Comment #5 on issue 275 by zbe...@google.com: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=275 Thanks for the explanation. I believe this needs a little clarification though: The local chrome tests don't use protobuf installed

Re: [protobuf] Error in java Main

This is because JDK 1.5 doesn't allow @Override to annotate a method that implements part of an interface. The compatibility issue is fixed in svn http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=384 You can either patch the diff, or wait for the next release (2.4.1) soon. On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 a

[protobuf] Re: Issue 275 in protobuf: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override

Updates: Status: OutOfScope Comment #4 on issue 275 by liuj...@google.com: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=275 Thanks P.J! Zdenek, looks like this isn't a protobuf specific problem. Would you please follo

[protobuf] Re: Issue 275 in protobuf: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override

Comment #3 on issue 275 by the.real...@gmail.com: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=275 This is intended and correct behavior for installs using --root and namespace packages. A --root install is not something tha

[protobuf] Re: Issue 275 in protobuf: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override

Updates: Cc: the.real...@gmail.com Comment #2 on issue 275 by liuj...@google.com: Incorrect installation with setup.py breaks local override http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=275 This is strange. When the --root is not given in the setup.py, the library will be pack

[protobuf] Re: Issue 260 in protobuf: protoc 2.4.0 doesn't compile service clauses for --java_out

Updates: Status: WorkingAsIntended Comment #5 on issue 260 by liuj...@google.com: protoc 2.4.0 doesn't compile service clauses for --java_out http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=260 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are

Re: [protobuf] mvn test failing in 2.4.0a java subproject

Should be fix in r384; will be included in the next release (2.4.1) On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Pherl Liu wrote: > I see, probably the AbstractMap.SimpleEntry usage in the > SmallSortedMapTest. > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Ph