Thanks Gravell's support on this issue.
In terms of the difficulities, we try to use another solution, use protobuf to
produce C++ object, then convert C++ object to XML by serialization moudle on
boost library.
At 2011-06-22 13:25:16，"Marc Gravell" wrote:
There's no direct XML relationship
I see. There are no pending patents either. I'm not sure why the FAQ was
worded ambiguously like that. We'll get it fixed, though we'll probably
have to run it by legal, so it might take a bit.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:51 AM, John Haine wrote:
> Kenton, many thanks for the prompt reply. Apo
On 06/22/2011 08:29 AM, Thiago wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing this to ask if others agree that publishing Protocol
> Buffers language and encoding as an IETF RFC would be a good idea.
I think a protobuf RFC would be fantastic!
> One of the questions I was asked when suggesting to adopt PB was:
Can you provide more information? What language/implementation are you
using, and what code snippet causes this failure?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:25 AM, AARADHANA SRIDHARAN wrote:
> Hello...
>
> Am getting "message descriptor failed" error.. Can anyone pls help me out
> with the causes of this
Your best bet is to look at the other C# projects; we don't maintain any C#
code. However, TextFormat in the C++ implementation does exactly this, so
you might be able to use that as a starting point. Of course the reflection
APIs may be different in the other implementations.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:30 AM, slookin wrote:
> I trying to develop "flexible" server for reciving message, i'm not
> able to create java classes for each message type, but I can upload
> proto descripter on server. Of course client (sender) will use
> generated java classes for prepare message
Hi all,
I'm writing this to ask if others agree that publishing Protocol
Buffers language and encoding as an IETF RFC would be a good idea.
One of the questions I was asked when suggesting to adopt PB was: "Is
this a standard or just a project that could be abandoned by the
creators/maintainers a
I trying to develop "flexible" server for reciving message, i'm not
able to create java classes for each message type, but I can upload
proto descripter on server. Of course client (sender) will use
generated java classes for prepare messages:
My code (sender):
Person.Builder person = Person.newBu
Hi Jason, that's what I was looking for. Thanks for the info!
Gabor
On Jun 20, 6:22 pm, Jason Hsueh wrote:
> I didn't really go through the whole thread, so I might have missed
> something, but it's not clear to me how you plan to distinguish different
> values in the data stream. But protobuf's
Kenton, many thanks for the prompt reply. Apologies for being
pedantic, but after all this is a legal question!
The FAQ states that Google have no _issued_ patents. My understanding
(I'm UK based) is that in US law an issued patent is one that is
granted. So in principle there could be pending
10 matches
Mail list logo
