On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Mike Grove wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Feng Xiao wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Mike Grove wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Feng Xiao wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:11 AM, M
Comment #2 on issue 353 by kku...@countertack.com: For widespread adoption,
site should provide official java jar download
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=353
Use maven as suggested in the README.TXT
I just did this and it worked fine to build my own jar
-rw-rw-r-- 1 kkuehl
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Feng Xiao wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Mike Grove wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Feng Xiao wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Michael Grove wrote:
>>>
I am using protobuf for the wire format of a
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Mike Grove wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Feng Xiao wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Michael Grove wrote:
>>
>>> I am using protobuf for the wire format of a protocol I'm working on as
>>> a replacement to JSON. The original
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Feng Xiao wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Michael Grove wrote:
>
>> I am using protobuf for the wire format of a protocol I'm working on as a
>> replacement to JSON. The original protobuf messages were not much more
>> than JSON as protobuf; my pr