Re: [protobuf] Improve message parsing speed

2013-02-21 Thread Feng Xiao
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Mike Grove wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Feng Xiao wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Mike Grove wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Feng Xiao wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:11 AM, M

[protobuf] Re: Issue 353 in protobuf: For widespread adoption, site should provide official java jar download

2013-02-21 Thread protobuf
Comment #2 on issue 353 by kku...@countertack.com: For widespread adoption, site should provide official java jar download http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=353 Use maven as suggested in the README.TXT I just did this and it worked fine to build my own jar -rw-rw-r-- 1 kkuehl

Re: [protobuf] Improve message parsing speed

2013-02-21 Thread Mike Grove
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Feng Xiao wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Mike Grove wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Feng Xiao wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Michael Grove wrote: >>> I am using protobuf for the wire format of a

Re: [protobuf] Improve message parsing speed

2013-02-21 Thread Feng Xiao
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Mike Grove wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Feng Xiao wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Michael Grove wrote: >> >>> I am using protobuf for the wire format of a protocol I'm working on as >>> a replacement to JSON. The original

Re: [protobuf] Improve message parsing speed

2013-02-21 Thread Mike Grove
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Feng Xiao wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Michael Grove wrote: > >> I am using protobuf for the wire format of a protocol I'm working on as a >> replacement to JSON. The original protobuf messages were not much more >> than JSON as protobuf; my pr