Re: [protobuf] Port to PPC64 architecture

2014-08-11 Thread Gregory P. Smith
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Gustavo Temple gustavo.temp...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone considered the porting Protobuf to the PPC64 architecture? It should already work without any changes. -gps -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol

[protobuf] Newbie here.. pass serializer functions to protobuf-net at runtime?

2014-08-11 Thread jens . barthel
Hi everyone, My problem is, that i can only determine at runtime how to serialize a certain class, called A for clarity. Accordingly, I was hoping for a way to tell the RuntimeTypeModel how to serialize A through a function/method call, for example by passing a delegate to it, or sth. similar.

Re: [protobuf] Newbie here.. pass serializer functions to protobuf-net at runtime?

2014-08-11 Thread Marc Gravell
This is specific to protobuf-net. The library does not currently expose any custom serialization extension point; to do that in a way that is genuinely useful, while not allowing the caller to break the wire format, is quite tricky. To date: it hasn't been necessary. If you can clarify *why* you

Re: [protobuf] Port to PPC64 architecture

2014-08-11 Thread Robert Edmonds
Gregory P. Smith wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Gustavo Temple gustavo.temp...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone considered the porting Protobuf to the PPC64 architecture? It should already work without any changes. No, definitely not. See: