Sorry that my original announcement has a wrong title
2014-08-25 20:34 GMT-07:00 Jie Luo :
> Hi all,
>
> The final release of Protobuf 2.6.0 is now available:
> https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/Download?tm=2
>
> Documentation will be updated soon.
>
> CHANGES
>
> 2014-08-15 ver
Hi all,
The final release of Protobuf 2.6.0 is now available:
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/Download?tm=2
Documentation will be updated soon.
CHANGES
2014-08-15 version 2.6.0:
General
* Added oneofs(unions) feature. Fields in the same oneof will share
memory and at most one f
Thanks~
I thought 2.6 will fully the lazy feature, disappointed that only
java-lite-runtime recognize this option:(
在 2014年8月26日星期二UTC+8上午11时14分30秒，Jie Luo写道：
>
> Hi all,
>
> The final release of Protobuf 2.6.0 is now available:
> https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/Download?tm=2
>
> Docu
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #2 on issue 663 by jie...@google.com: Undefined behavior while
running unit tests
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=663
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Updates:
Labels: FixedIn-2.6.0
Comment #5 on issue 576 by jie...@google.com: please add
TextFormat.printUnicode() or open class Printer
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=576
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 576 by jie...@google.com: please add
TextFormat.printUnicode() or open class Printer
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=576
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is confi
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 539 by jie...@google.com: Undefined behavior in
src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_helpers.cc
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=539
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this proje
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 568 by jie...@google.com:
DynamicMessage.Builder#setField allows enum values to be set for enum
fields, instead of EnumValueDescriptors only
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=568
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 615 by jie...@google.com: misleading document in python
api
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=615
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 636 by jie...@google.com: Bug in
com.google.protobuf.TextFormat.TextGenerator.print()
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=636
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is conf
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 625 by jie...@google.com: Exception safety issues in
RepeatedPtrField
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=625
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send a
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 650 by jie...@google.com: Clang barks at
file->options() != NULL
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=650
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 654 by jie...@google.com: Code bloat caused by
repeated_field.h #include'ing
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=654
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured t
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 506 by jie...@google.com: Java
DynamicMessage.Builder#getField doesn't return empty list for unset
repeated Message fields, but a default Message instead.
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=506
(No comment was entered for t
Hi all,
The final release of Protobuf 2.6.0 is now available:
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/Download?tm=2
Documentation will be updated soon.
CHANGES
2014-08-15 version 2.6.0:
General
* Added oneofs(unions) feature. Fields in the same oneof will share
memory and at most one f
We have discussed this feature request before and the decision is that we
won't support it. To achieve what you need, you can define a new message
type with all the parameters you need as fields and use this message as the
request type.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Marvin Somebody
wrote:
> H
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: FixedIn-2.6.0
Comment #10 on issue 488 by xiaof...@google.com: powerpc-linux cross
compilation not compiling anymore
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=488
Fixed in r575.
--
You received this message because this project is conf
Comment #24 on issue 213 by brendo...@gmail.com: libprotobuf.so.6 not found
after installation
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=213
Running ldconfig solved the problem for me as /usr/local/lib was already
specified in a /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf.
--
You received this mes
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Chris Berst wrote:
> Hello,
> I am new to this forum and hope I'm posting properly
> Do you know whether 2.6.0 will address the issue of Java 8 javadoc
> warnings for GPB 2.5.0 generated code?
>
We haven't tested protobuf with Java 8. I think these warnings will r
Hello,
I am new to this forum and hope I'm posting properly
Do you know whether 2.6.0 will address the issue of Java 8 javadoc warnings
for GPB 2.5.0 generated code?
Specifically, when running Java 8 javadoc I now see lots of 'no @return" or
'no @param' warnings on code generated from my .proto
Hello,
recently I started using protobuf for one of my projects, as I finished
with defining my services I tried to compile but it didn't worked. That was
because I defined my functions like at {2} , I did this because for me as
programmer it is normal that functions can be defined with more tha
21 matches
Mail list logo
