Re: [protobuf] Dynamic/run-time decoding

2014-10-15 Thread Jan Kyjovský
Hi, due to organization changes and budget costs this task is put on hold. Thank you for all your guidance up until now. If any further help is needed regarding this issue in the future me or someone else will continue with this thread. On Thursday, 11 September 2014 20:00:52 UTC+2, Feng Xiao

Re: [protobuf] Dynamic/run-time decoding

2014-10-15 Thread Jan Kyjovský
Hi, due to organization changes and budget cuts this task is put on hold. Thank you for all your guidance up until now. If any further help is needed regarding this issue in the future me or someone else will continue with this thread. On Thursday, 11 September 2014 20:00:52 UTC+2, Feng Xiao

Re: [protobuf] Null Nested Messages--whats expected?

2014-10-15 Thread Marc Gravell
I can't reproduce this outputting a 0x0; my example is below, and outputs 22-0A-12-08-73-6F-6D-65-43-69-74-79 - the null nested message is simply completely omitted; the contents are: - 2 bytes field-header and length-prefix for the location member - 2 bytes field-header and length-prefix for the

Re: [protobuf] Null Nested Messages--whats expected?

2014-10-15 Thread Marc Gravell
Just for visibility; we've discussed this more on github, and it *looks* to be a protostuff decoding issue, not a protobuf-net encoding issue; Johannes will take our findings to protostuff for further investigation. Arbitrary link is arbitrary:

[protobuf] Re: Null Nested Messages--whats expected?

2014-10-15 Thread Johannes Elgh
For full visibility: It turns out that the error was on my side. Apparently ProtoStuff can talk different dialects. ProtoStuff and ProtoBuf. It just depends on what IOUtil implementation you use. When you read for instance, either use: ProtobufIOUtil.mergeFrom(inputStream, t, schema, buffer);

[protobuf] Message encoding question

2014-10-15 Thread Tamás Somhegyi
Hello, I am quite new to Protocol Buffers but I have read the tutorials. There is one part of the encoding which I don't understand. How the message types are encoded? As I see the tutorial mentions the field encoding but the field id is unique only in the message. Best regards, Tamas -- You

[protobuf] Message encoding question

2014-10-15 Thread Tamás Somhegyi
Hello, I am quite new to Protocol Buffers but I have read the tutorials. There is one part of the encoding which I don't understand. How the message types are encoded? As I see the tutorial mentions the field encoding but the field id is unique only in the message. Best regards, Tamas -- You

Re: [protobuf] Message encoding question

2014-10-15 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Tamás Somhegyi somhegyi.ta...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am quite new to Protocol Buffers but I have read the tutorials. There is one part of the encoding which I don't understand. How the message types are encoded? As I see the tutorial mentions the field

[protobuf] Re: Issue 447 in protobuf: No C++11 move constructors

2014-10-15 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WontFix Owner: xiaof...@google.com Comment #10 on issue 447 by xiaof...@google.com: No C++11 move constructors https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447 FYI. Google's Style Guide now permits rvalue references to be used in move constructors and

[protobuf] Re: Issue 447 in protobuf: No C++11 move constructors

2014-10-15 Thread protobuf
Comment #11 on issue 447 by chen3feng: No C++11 move constructors https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447 Very disappointed to hear this message. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust

[protobuf] Re: Issue 447 in protobuf: No C++11 move constructors

2014-10-15 Thread protobuf
Comment #12 on issue 447 by cbsm...@gmail.com: No C++11 move constructors https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447 Speaks volumes that after 22 months after submission and 5 months after a working plugin was contributed, there isn't even a direct answer. -- You received this

[protobuf] Re: Issue 447 in protobuf: No C++11 move constructors

2014-10-15 Thread protobuf
Comment #13 on issue 447 by chen3feng: No C++11 move constructors https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447 let't make a fork on github? 2014-10-16 上午11:01于 proto...@googlecode.com写道: -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue