[protobuf] Re: [grpc-io] Python server and client - not found response?

2016-11-23 Thread 'Nathaniel Manista' via Protocol Buffers
+protobuf@googlegroups.com who will be able to contribute more on the protocol buffers side of the discussion On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Jesús García Crespo wrote: > First, I would like to say thanks to all of you for the great job! > Aww, you're very welcome! > I'm trying to wire two P

Re: [protobuf] Compile protobuf without pthread

2016-11-23 Thread 'Adam Cozzette' via Protocol Buffers
I think it should be possible to build without pthreads if you just make a few minor tweaks. I fiddled around with this a little bit and got something that seems to mostly work on a branch here (though I have not really tested it): https://github.com/acozzette/protobuf/tree/without-pthread I mostl

Re: [protobuf] typedef support

2016-11-23 Thread Arpit Baldeva
Thanks for the info. Typedef support would be pretty much useful for regular use cases in C/C++ languages. For example, if we have 100 messages that each have a game id, it'd be nice to just typedef say a uint64 to GameId rather than using it explicitly in each place. This avoids errors like someon

Re: [protobuf] typedef support

2016-11-23 Thread 'Adam Cozzette' via Protocol Buffers
I don't think we have any specific plans to do this, but we could consider doing at some point if it would be useful. Do you have a particular use case that would benefit from support for type aliasing? On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Arpit Baldeva wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any plans to introd

RE: [protobuf] Compilation warning with "arenas" option enabled for protobuf-3.1

2016-11-23 Thread Zhao, Changchun
Thank you, Adam, if it’s confirmed just matter of warning no harm, then I can live with it for now. Once I can upgrade the compiler, then as you tested, it should go away. Regards, Changchun Zhao | Software Engineer Transaction Network Services 10740 Parkridge Blvd | Suite 100 | Reston | VA

Re: [protobuf] Compilation warning with "arenas" option enabled for protobuf-3.1

2016-11-23 Thread 'Adam Cozzette' via Protocol Buffers
Changchun, actually I have looked at this a little bit more and I haven't been able to convince myself for sure of whether there is a bug or not. It seems suspicious to call a method on the inactive member of a union, but on the other hand both members are POD types and the UnsafeSetDefault() metho

[protobuf] Compile protobuf without pthread

2016-11-23 Thread Sam Van den Steen
Dear all, I'm developing some binary instrumentation tools where I use protobuf to save the output. I wrote a Pintool using this and everything works fine. However, I wanted to try DynamoRIO because Pin cannot be used to instrument ARM code. Apparently DynamoRIO cannot be linked against libpthr