[protobuf] [libprotobuf ERROR google/protobuf/message_lite.cc:118] Can't parse message of type "RegisterWatcherResponse" because it is missing required fields: rc

2017-06-16 Thread yihao yang
I updated a proto file from proto2 to proto3 as follows. Previous proto2: message RegisterWatcherResponse { required int32 rc = 1; optional uint64 sendTime = 2; } Now proto3: message RegisterWatcherResponse { int32 rc = 1; optional uint64 sendTime = 2; } I tested compatibility by using

Re: [protobuf] Is the extension registry address still monitored?

2017-06-16 Thread 'Feng Xiao' via Protocol Buffers
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Marc Gravell wrote: > In descriptor.proto, it asks public authors to request extension numbers > (for the DSL) via protobuf-global-extension-regis...@google.com It is monitored, but these emails (one request in about one to two months) can easily be missed as th

[protobuf] Is the extension registry address still monitored?

2017-06-16 Thread Marc Gravell
In descriptor.proto, it asks public authors to request extension numbers (for the DSL) via protobuf-global-extension-regis...@google.com I've done this, but without response. Is this address being monitored? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol

[protobuf] What is the future roadmap for Protocol Buffers?

2017-06-16 Thread david . richardson
Hello. I'm currently architecting a data platform, and am looking at Protocol Buffers to solve a variety of problems. However to assess if Protocol Buffers will be applicable to our solution I need to know what the roadmap is for future releases. Many thanks. Dave. -- You received this mess