Re: [protobuf] FieldMask usage in C++

Are you using the FieldMask as a way of performing an update? If so, I believe you would want to use FieldMaskUtil::MergeMessageTo() to update the fields indicated in the mask. That way, you don't have to manually check which paths are present. On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Antonia Elsen

[protobuf] Re: Integrate proto2 messages from a device to C#

Thanks, I tested a single file and it works. I am new to this, I have another question. If I have several proto files, and some of them have a line "import xxx.proto;", which refers to many other proto files, do I need to compile each of these .proto in any particular order? El viernes, 27

Re: [protobuf] Integrate proto2 messages from a device to C#

protobuf-net should work with proto 2 - try here: https://protogen.marcgravell.com On 27 Oct 2017 6:16 p.m., "cleal" wrote: > I have to integrate a third part protocol from a gps device, they send me > the .proto files, they are using the schema proto2. > > I should

Re: [protobuf] Integrate proto2 messages from a device to C#

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:16 AM, cleal wrote: > I have to integrate a third part protocol from a gps device, they send me > the .proto files, they are using the schema proto2. > > I should receive the binary messages and I need desarialize it in order to > work with the

[protobuf] Integrate proto2 messages from a device to C#

I have to integrate a third part protocol from a gps device, they send me the .proto files, they are using the schema proto2. I should receive the binary messages and I need desarialize it in order to work with the location data. But I see in forums that C# only works for proto3. There is

Re: [protobuf] protobuf 2.4.1 crash during ParseFromArray

Oh, if all you're worried about is compatibility then I would definitely upgrade to the latest version (currently 3.4.1). We take great care to preserve wire format compatibility and so all your existing serialized messages will be readable with the latest protobuf version. You just have to make

Re: [protobuf] protobuf 2.4.1 crash during ParseFromArray

Yes, very early on during initialization of the library. My only concern with upgrading to a new version of protobuf is backward compatibility. Should I stick with 2.6 or go with 3.x? I know I can't use any of the new features but will all my current messages be recognizable across the