The new parser code is not yet safe for big endian machines. However you
can enable it by compiling with
-DPROTOBUF_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_PARSER
On Wednesday, May 8, 2019 at 2:03:29 PM UTC-7, Hao Nguyen wrote:
>
> +Gerben Stavenga Can you help document how external users
> can use the new pars
Thanks this will be solved asap
On Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 10:50:45 PM UTC-7, David Purdie wrote:
>
> In the header file src/google/protobuf/stubs/hash.h
> The line:
>
> # if __GNUC__ == 4 && defined(__GNUC__MINOR__) && __GNUC__MINOR__ <= 1
>
>
> is incorrect. __GNUC__MINOR__ does not exis
It seems that somehow Atomic32 and Atomic64 become the same type.
Feng you are the most knowledgeable on cross compiling. Do you know what
happens here?
On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 1:21:55 AM UTC-7, jebina elsie wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to cross compile the Protobuf 3.3.0 to the 64 b
Thanks we are looking into it
On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 10:29:54 AM UTC-7, ramrun...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Hi there list!
>
> I am compiling protobuf-cpp-3.1.0.tar.gz on:
>
> OpenBSD 6.00 GENERIC.MP#2319 amd64
> with
>
> $ eg++ -v
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=eg++
>
> COLLECT_LTO_
I dont think the OS matters. Which version of g++ do you use?
On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 2:47:24 PM UTC-7, Sowmya Narayanam wrote:
>
> Can i compile protobuf-3.0 on freebsd-7
>
> Is there any compatibility matrix , for the supported OS and the probuf
> versions.
>
> I tried compiling and i
No you have to make your proto definition of the structure of your class
yourself.
There is no existing tool for that. The generated code will also be
incompatible, with your custom implementation
On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 2:47:24 PM UTC-7, Gayatri Shah wrote:
>
> I am new to Protocol buf
Yes circular dependencies are possible and it works.
For example
message Tree {
message InnerNode {
Tree left = 1;
Tree right = 2;
}
oneof leaf_or_node {
int leaf = 1;
InnerNode node = 2;
}
}
is a valid and useful protobuf to store binary trees.
On Monday, July 18, 2016
