Re: Memory leak?

2009-03-09 Thread Marc Vaillant
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:52:05PM -0800, Kenton Varda wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Marc Vaillant wrote: > > > Static is dangerous in multithreaded scenarios for obvious reasons. > These issues just add more complications. > > > Static constants ar

Re: Memory leak?

2009-03-06 Thread Marc Vaillant
th the background thread still running. > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Marc Vaillant wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:52:07AM -0800, Kenton Varda wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:50 AM, marc wrote: > > > > Isn't this

Re: Memory leak?

2009-03-06 Thread Marc Vaillant
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:52:07AM -0800, Kenton Varda wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:50 AM, marc wrote: > > Isn't this a common scenario in C++ for which stdlib provides a simple > solution, std::auto_ptr? std::auto_ptr is a lightweight class designed > to "RAIIify" pointers. Wh