Re: [protobuf] How to make a self-describing message

Unfortunately no.. You could, however, put the Emessages opCode in the MsgFirst message (instead of in the MsgHeader). Then you can specify the default value for the EMessages to MSG_FIRST. On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Barzo wrote: > Hi, > I'm new to PB and I would ask a simple thing... > I

Re: [protobuf] gcc 4.7.0 compile error with -std=c++11

The internal version is already c++11 compatible. It will be included in the next release. On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Brian Nesbitt wrote: > Hello folks, > > Protobuf 2.4.1 fails to build using gcc 4.7.0 (on CentOS 6.2) with the > C++11 standard enabled (-std=c++11). The error is shown at t

Re: [protobuf] Package Mandatory ?

The function name is determined by the source proto file path. Looks like you always generate messages from a single .proto file. You would have to generate the message in different files. Otherwise, even if you worked around the function name issue, the runtime DescriptorPool would complained abou

Re: [protobuf] proto buff crash

It sounds like a memory ownership issue. Basically the message object owns the fields (including the unknown fields). From the stack trace, the string is probably freed before the destructor is called. Could you please write a simple function that could reproduce this issue? On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 a

Re: [protobuf] 2.4.1 on Win32 with VC 2008 cannot pass the tests.

Could you please post the error logs? On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Wei Cheng wrote: > The lite-test passes well. > The tests either crash (release mode always, debug mode sometimes) or > failed 12 tests of CommandLineInterfaceTests. > Is there anyone else has the same problem? > Thanks. > >

Re: [protobuf] Re: Contribution: C++Builder Compiling

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Scott Saad wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for adding a link! > > We'd like to accept patches. However, we don't have enough engineering >> resources to maintain another platform. Supporting a different platform >> requires much testing work in the release process (

Re: [protobuf] Re: Contribution: C++Builder Compiling

Thanks for the work! I've put a link in the 3rd party wiki page On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Scott Saad wrote: > A quick status update on this effort: > >- I forked the source at GitHub under the > protobuf-cppbuilder

Re: [protobuf] Why can't we clear UnknownFields from a Java instance?

You cannot clear the unknown fields in a message because messages are immutable. However, you can parse the bytes into a builder, and then clear the unknowns fields there. On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Ashwin Jayaprakash < ashwin.jayaprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, I have 2 simple messages def

Re: [protobuf] Java Nested Builders being built on insert?

Can you use addChildBuilder() API for the repeated field, and then call addGrandChildBuilder() in the returned builder? On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:24 AM, users wrote: > I am working on a solution to basically allow me to persist any > protocol buffer with hibernate. However, I have run into

Re: [protobuf] Java: Is there a way to create a new builder for a Message given one of its FieldDescriptors?

I assume you want to use generated class. In that case, you can keep a map from Descriptor to the default instance. Then when you get the FieldDescriptor, you can get the containing type Descriptor; then look up the map the get the default instance, and call newBuilderForType() to get the generated

Re: [protobuf] build protobuf without iostreams

There are plenty of APIs for different IOs including string, array, please take a look at the message_lite.h. Also you can implement your own ZeroCopyStream for your IO layer. On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:23 AM, anand wrote: > Hello All, > > Is it possible to use protobuf without iostreams? > > Tha

Re: [protobuf] release date for next version

Sorry, I mean Q4 2011. On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Pherl Liu wrote: > Probably this quarter. There are still couple of memory issues for the > experimental C++ implementation for python that we'd like to fix before next > release. > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 a

Re: [protobuf] release date for next version

Probably this quarter. There are still couple of memory issues for the experimental C++ implementation for python that we'd like to fix before next release. On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Chris Morris wrote: > When is the next version coming out? > > -- > You received this message because you a

Re: [protobuf] A new third-party implementation

Added to http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns Thanks for the work! On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:28 PM, jpa wrote: > Hi, > > Here is my ansi-C implementation of Protocol Buffers for memory- > restricted embedded devices: > http://koti.kapsi.fi/jpa/nanopb/ > > It's still in its in

Re: [protobuf] Extensions with Python

Take a look at Python API. http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/reference/python-generated.html#extension There are few examples of how to use extensions in Python. On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Dave wrote: > Hi, I have a C++ based service that uses messages defined like so > >

Re: [protobuf] Initialisation of nested messages ?

You cannot set default values for messages (or fields in message). You would have to create default instances of ColorData in your code. On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Werner wrote: > Hello, > > message ColorData > { > required int32 red =263; > required int32 green =264; > required int32

Re: [protobuf] C++ implementation for Python

There's no lite-runtime for python. It's generally reflection based. On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Slava wrote: > Hi, > is there any way to use lite runtime for the subj? > Thanks in advance. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers

Re: [protobuf] build PB with c++ builder XE (runtime - not compiler)

Unfortunately we officially doesn't support this platform, and I'm not aware of any 3rd party BCB support. You can try to make it BCB compatible, and share with other users :) It requires lots of work to support a certain platform though, e.g. there are #ifdef _MSC_VER everywhere. On Sat, Sep 10,

Re: [protobuf] My Protocol Buffers implementation in C#

Done. Thanks for the work. On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Peter Hultqvist wrote: > Hello > > I have been working on this c# code generating Protocol Buffers > implementation for a while and now I dare to announce it. > > https://silentorbit.com/**protobuf/

Re: [protobuf] protocol buffer for android and Iphone application

You can use protobuf-lite for Android (see the java/README.txt); for iphone, there are some 3rd-party add-ons for object-c. Take a look at http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Visionweb wrote:. > Hello, > > Just a question. Is it a version avai

Re: [protobuf] Custom options namespace

The document generally said you can use the same extension number for different level of options, but the qualified extension name needs to be unique. e.g. a single extension name cannot extend more than one type. That said, you probably have to use different option name for the purpose. Note, the

Re: [protobuf] How can unknown fields appear in a message?

Can you try to print the DebugString() of the message containing unknown fields? One possibility is you used the wrong message type to parse the bytes. On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Michael Videlgauz wrote: > Hello! > > I am now investigating a bug in my program under debugger (VS2008 > IDE).

Re: [protobuf] Protobuf for Android

The size isn't correct. Please run mvn clean; then mvn package -P lite The correct size is around 80k On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:12 AM, sanjoy wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a version of protobuf for Android? I built the "lite" > version of protobuf-2.4.1 and its 450KB. That's huge. Is there > a

Re: [protobuf] Re: Java - DynamicMessage and FileDescriptorProto

desBuilder.addField(fd1Builder.build()); > > > > > with message typed field I set type as > > > 'DescriptorProtos.FieldDescriptorProto.Type.TYPE_MESSAGE'. How do I > > > describe the field type? > > > I mean, I suppose to describe the field

Re: [protobuf] Out-of-date Extensions Documentation?

Quote: >> Foo foo; foo.SetExtension(bar, 15); Similarly, the Foo class defines templated accessors HasExtension(), ClearExtension(), GetExtension(), MutableExtension(), and AddExtension(). end quote << To re-write the sentence: "Similarly to the SetExtension() mentioned in the above example, the F

Re: [protobuf] how to create descriptors dynamically with repeated and complex fields

See my response in the other thread. You can set label to the FieldDescriptorProto. On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Giancarlo Frison wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm attempting to create descriptors dynamically for generating custom > message on the fly. > The trouble is when I have to describe a field

Re: [protobuf] Out-of-date Extensions Documentation?

The SetExtension() is mentioned in the example. The accessors mentioned in the following paragraph are "similar" to the SetExtension template function. On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Chris Morris wrote: > Should the Extensions section in the Language Guide ( > http://code.google.com/apis/protoc

Re: [protobuf] Failed test from tests.exe and lite-test.exe

I didn't see any test failures from your log: [==] 764 tests from 102 test cases ran. (3249 ms total) [ PASSED ] 764 tests. The ERROR logs are expected, to test the protoc complains in some situations. On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Chris Morris wrote: > So I downloaded the source t

Re: [protobuf] Re: Java - DynamicMessage and FileDescriptorProto

Not sure if I understand your question correctly. You can set the label in FieldDescriptorProto: LABEL_OPTIONAL = 1; LABEL_REQUIRED = 2;LABEL_REPEATED = 3; On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Giancarlo Frison wrote: > There is this example that I'm approaching to re-implement > http://

Re: [protobuf] Java - DynamicMessage and FileDescriptorProto

Take a look at com.google.protobuf.Descriptors and com.google.protobuf.DynamicMessage On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:20 AM, yoave wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got 2 questions: > > 1. how do I generate a Descriptor from a FileDescriptorProto in Java? > In cpp, I'm using DescriptorPool class's 'BuildFil

Re: [protobuf] about add_field、copyfrom

In C++ protobuf, each message owns its fields. That said, two different messages cannot share a sub-message, which will complicate the system when releasing resources. In your case, if you always need to copy the records, there may be a better design. For instance, keep the records in a global poo

Re: [protobuf] Re: Inserting values by tag numbers

wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using java I found the corresponding methods in java. Thanks for > the quick response. > > > On Jul 8, 3:08 am, Pherl Liu wrote: > > Which language are you using? In c++, you can call > > message::GetDescriptor()->FindFieldByNumber()

Re: [protobuf] Allocator Support for strings

In the common.h, we have a "using namespace std;", and we use "string" directly in runtime libraries. However, we use "::std::string" in generated file; you need to modify the proto compiler to support different string allocators. We do have custom allocator support in our TODO list internally, bu

Re: [protobuf] Inserting values by tag numbers

Which language are you using? In c++, you can call message::GetDescriptor()->FindFieldByNumber() to get a FieldDescriptor; then call GetReflection()->Set* functions. On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:58 AM, SM wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a way to set the field value by the tag which we mention in > the

Re: [protobuf] Re: How to use protoc --decode option?

or. > > "Failed to parse input." > > Thanks, > Ravikumar K > > On Jul 5, 7:06 pm, Pherl Liu wrote: > > The protoc reads the input from STDIN. If you pass the payload file name > as > > parameter, protoc will treat that file as a ".proto" file.

Re: [protobuf] How to use protoc --decode option?

The protoc reads the input from STDIN. If you pass the payload file name as parameter, protoc will treat that file as a ".proto" file. You should pipe the payload to protoc instead. On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Ravi wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to convert a protobuf stream in to a readable fo

Re: [protobuf] installation in windows

Please take a look at the vsprojects/readme.txt On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Enrico Viappiani wrote: > Let me ask a stupid question.. I have to install protobuf 2.4.1 C++, > in windows 7 64 bit. > I've done that in ubuntu, but i don't have seen the installation > instruction for windows aroun

Re: [protobuf] Undefined references to `google::protobuf::internal::kEmptyString'

protobuf-c is a 3rd party plugin/branch, which is not in official protobuf release. You may need to contact the author directly. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Greg Corradini wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to compile protobuf-c-0.15 on Ubuntu-10.10. I've been > running into this undefined refere

Re: [protobuf] Uploading the maven-protoc-plugin to Maven Central?

+Gregory On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Marco Tedone wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there a reason why the plugin hasn't been uploaded to Maven > Central? If you want I could take ownership of that but then I'd have > to be the owner of the com.google.protobuf Maven groupId, which I > don't think is a

Re: [protobuf] Dynamic deserialization of enums

This is because EnumValueDescriptor doesn't override toString(). You can use getName() and getValue() in the EnumValueDescriptor to read the value. EnumValueDescriptor is defined in com.google.protobuf.Descriptors On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Nik Hodgkinson <11x...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm wo

Re: [protobuf] Copy nested repeated messages

This shouldn't happen.. That means your unfiltered C also contains uninitialized messages.. Did you add new required fields in your .proto file (or change optional to required)? On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:55 AM, ksamdev wrote: > Hi, > > I've got nested messages like: > > message A > { >require

Re: [protobuf] How to convert Descriptors.Descriptor to Java class name?

Quoted from our internal discussion by Kenton: You should build a Map upfront, mapping every descriptor you care about to the corresponding default instance. Avoid using Class objects because that will make your code incompatible with DynamicMessage. Using default instances instead avoids this p

Re: [protobuf] Best Practices on updating generated Message object

You can probably use sub-builders in this case: e.g. myBuilder.getPriceBuilder().setValue(123); See http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/reference/java-generated.html#messagein sub builders section. On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:58 PM, veaven wrote: > Hi, > > What's the best practices

Re: [protobuf] Problem with reading class

That one will parse from binary encoded data. Looks like your sample_message.txt is in ASCII format. In short: Binary format: serialize: msg.writeTo() / msg.toByteArray() parsing: MyMessage.parseFrom() / builder.mergeFrom() ASCII format: serialize: msg.toString() / TextFormat.printToString() parsi

Re: [protobuf] Numeric range not supported?

We also have another internal thread talking about the "restriction" support for protobuf. Basically we think the restriction or value validation function of protobuf should be implemented in the upper layer due to various concerns.. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Marco Tedone wrote: > Hi all,

Re: [protobuf] How can I set multi proto_path

Yes, you can. See: http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/proto.html#generating On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:39 PM, jonason wrote: > can I set multi proto_path? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To post to this

Re: [protobuf] Optional,Repated fields and Submessages

NIT functions are used in this case > instead of a constructor in C++. > > Thanks for your reply. > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Pherl Liu wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, aara wrote: >> >>> I actually have 3 questions. >>&g

Re: [protobuf] Optional,Repated fields and Submessages

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, aara wrote: > I actually have 3 questions. > > 1.When we specify default values for optional fields,the default value > gets assigned automatically when we ourselves dont assign it a value. > But why doesnt the has_member field get set to 1??? It still remains > ze

Re: [protobuf] Python ParseFromString always returns None

+robinson The ParseFromString() in python now always returns None. Note the MergeFromString() returns the number of bytes read, but there's a TODO to make that always return None. Will may have some ideas about this. On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:22 PM, jsia wrote: > Hi, > > I created a proto file

Re: [protobuf] protobuf-2.4.1 (java) build problems

Does setting higher heap memories in jvm flags(i.e. -Xmx) help? On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:23 PM, bogl wrote: > Hello > I'm trying to create generated-sources and generated-test-sources > files for protobuf-2.4.1 (java), but getting an error message: > > [INFO] > -

Re: [protobuf] Re: Generated hashcode() returns different values across JVM instances?

We discussed internally and decided not to make the hashCode() return deterministic result. If you need consistent hashcode in different runs, use toByteString().hashCode(). Quoted from Kenton: Hashing the content of the descriptor would actually be incorrect, because two descriptors with exactly

Re: [protobuf] Re: MSVC 2010 x64 build fails tests

Strange, looks like the serialization & parsing are completely broken in MSVC 2010. Have you ever installed early versions? Could you please try a clean build? On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Mark S wrote: > This also fails with the new 2.4.1 release using MSVC 2010 SP1. > > -- > You received t

Re: [protobuf] 'RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer' object has no attribute 'extend'

This is probably a wrong version problem. Have you installed previous versions? Could you try: import google.protobuf print google.protobuf.__file__ On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:54 AM, William Tu wrote: > Hi, > I just downloaded the protocol buffer 2.4.1 and I followed the foo bar > example for pyt

[protobuf] 2.4.1 released.

The v2.4.1 Protobuf is uploaded: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/downloads/list v2.4.1 is a bug fix release for v2.4.0 and v2.4.0a. CHANGES 2011-05-01 version 2.4.1: C++ * Fixed the frendship problem for old compilers to make the library now gcc 3 compatible again. * Fixed v

Re: [protobuf] Error in java Main

This is because JDK 1.5 doesn't allow @Override to annotate a method that implements part of an interface. The compatibility issue is fixed in svn http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=384 You can either patch the diff, or wait for the next release (2.4.1) soon. On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 a

Re: [protobuf] mvn test failing in 2.4.0a java subproject

Should be fix in r384<http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=384>; will be included in the next release (2.4.1) On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Pherl Liu wrote: > I see, probably the AbstractMap.SimpleEntry usage in the > SmallSortedMapTest. > > > On Thu, Apr

Re: [protobuf] mvn test failing in 2.4.0a java subproject

I see, probably the AbstractMap.SimpleEntry usage in the SmallSortedMapTest. On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Pherl Liu wrote: > Hmm, what errors did you get after removing the @Override annotations? > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:07 AM, CRozeboom wrote: > >> I installed m

Re: [protobuf] mvn test failing in 2.4.0a java subproject

Hmm, what errors did you get after removing the @Override annotations? On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:07 AM, CRozeboom wrote: > I installed maven and am trying to build the java jar files for a > project. I've tried this on a Windows XP and Ubuntu 10.10 system with > the same results. I've even trie

Re: [protobuf] mvn test failing in 2.4.0a java subproject

I see, so you are using JDK1.5. Will send out a fix for this. On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:07 AM, CRozeboom wrote: > I installed maven and am trying to build the java jar files for a > project. I've tried this on a Windows XP and Ubuntu 10.10 system with > the same results. I've even tried removin

Re: [protobuf] mvn test failing

Looks like a classpath problem for the easy mock.. Could you please double check if net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer is installed and set in the classpath of your environment? On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:40 AM, danbaatar wrote: > I am trying to compile version 2.3.0 (for compatibility with protoc > in

Re: [protobuf] Re: adding submessages to higher message

Yes, you should use AddAllocated() in this case. Noted that the ownership of the object will be passed to the wrapper proto. On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Aaron Rich wrote: > I found the method: > AddAllocated(Element*) > > which I think will add the Pong* that I have already created/allocate

Re: [protobuf] Reusing builders. . .

You might want to have a benchmark for this. Allocation in Java is cheap, but would increase the GC costs; resetting builder will introduce some CPU overhead (recursively setting data members and bit masks). On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:15 AM, David Dabbs wrote: > Hello. > > I have a PB builder I b

Re: [protobuf] Re: Issue 270 in protobuf: Precompiled protoc binary for OS X

Also, you can upgrade your gcc to 4.3+ if possible. On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Pherl Liu wrote: > This is due to the gcc 3.x bug. A workaround is submitted in svn > r380<http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=380>. > You can use svn head version, or patch th

Re: [protobuf] Re: Issue 270 in protobuf: Precompiled protoc binary for OS X

This is due to the gcc 3.x bug. A workaround is submitted in svn r380. You can use svn head version, or patch the r380, or wait for the coming 2.4.1 release (soon). On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Inderjeet Singh wrote: > I have OSX 10.5 an

Re: [protobuf] Search inside a protocolbuffers file

kar P wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Sankar P > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Pherl Liu wrote: > >> protobuf officially does not provide this function. There might be some > 3rd > >> party libraries though. > >> > > > > I

Re: [protobuf] Search inside a protocolbuffers file

protobuf officially does not provide this function. There might be some 3rd party libraries though. On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Sankar wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use protocolbuffers as a storage database for my > application, as it provides data-format-versioning which is not > availabl

Re: [protobuf] Java: Protobuf jars compatibility (2.4.0 with 2.0.3)

No, there's no version backward-compatibility like this. protobuf library only works with the matching protoc generated files. There's a feature requestaskin

Re: [protobuf] Android Cross Compile

o" or "result: yes" >From your error message, it seems android NDK doesn't require any flags to link pthread... On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Pherl Liu wrote: > Looks like pthread library is missing. This should have been covered > by the acx_pthread.m4 script. Could yo

Re: [protobuf] Android Cross Compile

Looks like pthread library is missing. This should have been covered by the acx_pthread.m4 script. Could you please try to manually run the linker(the g++ line you pasted in email), by adding extra -pthread and/or -lpthread parameters? On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Evol wrote: > Hello, > > I a

Re: [protobuf] Re: How to Programmatically determine the Builder method names (getter and setter) for a given field name

You can find the algorithm in source code. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/browse/trunk/src/google/protobuf/compiler/java/java_helpers.cc On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Ravi wrote: > Hi Thanks a lot for your time. > > Yes the approach looks very clean as the api getField and setField a

Re: [protobuf] python/setup.py

OK, it turns out we will use whatever "protoc" in the PATH as a fail over. This change is probably fine then. Sent you a code review. Also add a warning message if the protoc is set via env variable. On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Pherl Liu wrote: > I'm a bit concerned about

Re: [protobuf] python/setup.py

I'm a bit concerned about setting arbitrary proto compiler via environment variables. Protobuf runtime library requires exactly matching protoc generated classes to work. Separating the protoc and library potentially increased the risk of having incompatibility errors. Not sure if this would bring

Re: [protobuf] About "import"

Right. Please see the document in http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/proto.html The protocol compiler searches for imported files in a set of directories specified on the protocol compiler command line using the -I/--proto_pathflag. If no flag was given, it looks in the directory in

Re: [protobuf] Re: Compilation error for ppc/440 target

A workaround is now in svn: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=380 Could you please try patch the diff to check if that fixes the problem? Thanks. On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:06 PM, dear chap wrote: > Unfortunately we have to use the particular compiler in question and > cannot upg

Re: [protobuf] Circular package import problem

You probably need to break up your proto files to eliminate the circular dependency.. (i.e. have multiple .proto files for a package, and only import necessary .proto files). On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Ken wrote: > Hi, > > I have two proto files: A.proto and B.proto. If I import package B i

Re: [protobuf] Protobuf 2.4 and Android

The protobuf in android source code is a branched protobuf for google voice, which is not intended for public use, and may change in the future. Generally, you should use the opensource version of protobuf in your app, set the "option optimize_for = "LITE_RUNTIME";" in your proto file and use the p

Re: [protobuf] v2.4 question

2.4.0a is officially released now. Please check: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/downloads/list On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:12 AM, David Dabbs wrote: > Hello. > > > > From what I gather catching up on list messages, 2.4 is final, but not > officially released, perhaps because some documentation

[protobuf] 2.4.0a released.

The final release of 2.4.0a Protobuf is uploaded: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/downloads/list Note that 2.4.0a fixed a java protobuf-lite build problem in 2.4.0. If you are using the 2.4.0 version, please upgrade to 2.4.0a (the only diff is the java protobuf-lite problem). Documentation upda

Re: [protobuf] 2.4.0 release?

It isn't officially announced yet, but the files are on the site, feel free to try it out. We are still working on the documentation. The final release would be very soon. On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:17 AM, CB wrote: > I'm considering updating from 2.3.0 to 2.4.0, but it seems 2.4.0 isn't > final,

Re: [protobuf] 2.4.0 not compiling lite version for Java

can update the pom.xml with this one: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn-history/r373/trunk/java/pom.xml Thanks. On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Pherl Liu wrote: > Thanks for reporting this. Working on a fix now. > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Michael wrote: > >>

Re: [protobuf] 2.4.0 not compiling lite version for Java

Thanks for reporting this. Working on a fix now. On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Michael wrote: > Using the normal mvn package/install commands, the size of the jar > files generated by Maven for 2.4.0 is identical for the normal and > lite versions. This is not true under 2.3.0. Also, I can'

Re: [protobuf] Re: 2.4.0 release candidate #1

You can try: InfoClass.Builder builder = info.toBuilder(); builder.getKeyBuilder().getPrivateBuilder().setD(ByteString.copyFrom(decryptedPrivateKey)); info = builder.build(); On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Scratch wrote: > Hi there! > I've seen that there're new sub-builders for sub-messages (

Re: [protobuf] Re: 2.4 release?

It's on the SVN head now, see http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=349 Will make a release candidate soon. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: > Just wanted to follow up on this and see if this is still on target to > be released within a month or so, and still incl