2 AM UTC-8 marc.g...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> IIRC, the leading dot means that the name is absolute rather than
>>> relative. I'm not sure it represents an error.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, 19:00 'Venkat Duddu' via Protocol Buffers,
, December 22, 2021 at 11:18:12 AM UTC-8 marc.g...@gmail.com
wrote:
> IIRC, the leading dot means that the name is absolute rather than
> relative. I'm not sure it represents an error.
>
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, 19:00 'Venkat Duddu' via Protocol Buffers, <
> prot...@goo
We are seeing extra dot for external referenced variables in descriptorData
in the generated java class for a given Message.
*Message Definition*
syntax = "proto3";
package com.chegg;
import "google/protobuf/struct.proto";
message OneGraphRequest {
string operation_name = 1;
google.protobuf.Str
I have a use case where we want to de-serialize the protobuf message into
Generic key value pairs like Map (something similar to
support in Jackson deserialize json into generic map).
At the time of deserialization I have the proto schema along with data
(bytest) to deserialize, but not the gen
a little bit
> further down the page, but it looks like the warning is in the wrong place.
> Thank you for letting us know. I'm working on a fix for this.
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 3:01 PM Venkat Duddu wrote:
>
>> This section
>> https://developers.google.com/proto
This section
https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto3#importing_definitions
says Note that this feature is not available in Java.
I tried generating java classes for proto files that have imports and
protoc worked fine without any issues.
Can I get clarification on what tha
