Done. But it occurs to me that this isn't all that much nicer a solution
than just calling getSerializedSize() in writeTo(CodedOutputStream
output), except that it only happens for messages with packed fields,
rather than all messages. Should this compute only the serialized size
of the packed
Done. I kept the change to initialize the memoized size of packed fields
to -1, just for consistency with the message's size.
On 2009/11/25 20:51:52, kenton wrote:
You're right, we might as well always call it.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:08 AM, mailto:jas...@google.com wrote:
Done. But it
On Aug 24, 7:51 am, Saptarshi saptarshi.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Suppose I would like to store a type that could be a sequence of raw
bytes, so
message ...{
optional bytes sdata1=1; //A
repeated bytes sdata2=2; //B
optional BYT sdata3=3; //C
On Jul 21, 11:00 pm, Benedikt Hallinger
b.hallin...@skyforcesystems.de wrote:
Hello,
thank you very much for the ideas. Since i will have a unknowable ammount
of Message types, extensions would be the way to go.
Your were right with the assumption that i use Java.
The construct and send
This looks to be a real problem. Kenton's on vacation but should be
back soon (tomorrow I think) so he can take a look at the patch then.
On Jul 22, 8:36 am, anonymous eric.pe...@hp.com wrote:
Hello,
I was not able to compile a Java file generated by protoc 2.10 from a
rather big .proto
How about using extensions to solve this? You could define a generic
message:
message Packet {
extensions n to m;
}
// Payload messages
message TestMessage {
extend Packet {
optional TestMessage test = 10;
}
required string msg = 2;
}
message TestMessage2 {
extend Packet {
By the way you may want to look at the section on Union Types in the
docs: http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/techniques.html#union
On Jul 21, 9:51 am, jasonh jas...@google.com wrote:
How about using extensions to solve this? You could define a generic
message:
message Packet
On Jul 15, 5:33 am, Kaj Bjurman kaj.bjur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have just read the tutorials and the some threads in these forums,
but there's one thing that I can't find an answer for. I'm currently
using a router that is responsible to route different messages to
different servers.
:
On 2009/05/06 01:03:14, jasonh wrote:
Indent() for prettier generated code?
Done.
http://codereview.appspot.com/53053/diff/1/6
File google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_message.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/53053/diff/1/6#newcode608
Line 608: delete $classname$::default_instance_;\n
Sorry about the delay. Mostly looks good, just a few nits
http://codereview.appspot.com/53053/diff/1/5
File google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_file.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/53053/diff/1/5#newcode401
Line 401:
Indent() for prettier generated code?
10 matches
Mail list logo
