gt; in many internal applications.
>
> Note that simply adding a zero tag would cause the parser (CodedInputStream)
> to stop reading bytes, but would also make ConsumedEntireMessage() false.
> This would make most of the higher level message-parsing routines fail.
>
> On
a.
>
> I openly confess to having a strong like for "groups" - they do make the
> encoding process simpler :p
>
> Marc
>
> On 7 Jul 2011, at 14:18, nicolas hofmann wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > My question is simple but i didn't found the an
My question is simple but i didn't found the answer anywhere. I was
wondering why the tag number range started at one and not zero.
I was looking for a way to stream multiple messages without having to
compute their sizes and realized that just add a zero tag number at
the end could be a good way
