Comment #5 on issue 630 by kral.voj...@gmail.com: Java: initializing
bitFields variables
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=630
And just quick wondering why are the other number types properties not set
as bitFields so by JVM only without the setting in initialization
Comment #4 on issue 630 by xiaof...@google.com: Java: initializing
bitFields variables
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=630
If you are implementing your own parsing methods, it's better to only use
public methods (e.g., clear() when you want to reset a mesasge). Int
Comment #3 on issue 630 by kral.voj...@gmail.com: Java: initializing
bitFields variables
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=630
Ok, I needed different behavior from the parsing so I had to call it by
myself and I noticed this handling of bitFields and since I was not sure
Comment #2 on issue 630 by kral.voj...@gmail.com: Java: initializing
bitFields variables
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=630
Ok, I needed different behavior from the parsing so I had to call it by
myself and I noticed this handling of bitFields and since I was not sure
Updates:
Status: WorkingAsIntended
Comment #1 on issue 630 by xiaof...@google.com: Java: initializing
bitFields variables
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=630
This is working as intended. bitFields should be initialized to all zeros
and it's reasonable to n
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 630 by kral.voj...@gmail.com: Java: initializing bitFields
variables
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=630
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Generate Java class
What is the expected output? What
Comment #46 on issue 57 by ag.coolg...@gmail.com: null values should be
treated as no value
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57
To have null in proto buffer, can workaround be something like wrapping the
value and type of value(null/non-null) into a message and then send
Comment #45 on issue 57 by ankit.ga...@gmail.com: null values should be
treated as no value
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57
To have null in proto buffer, can workaround me something like wrapping the
value and type of value(null/non-null) into a message and then send
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 629 by yanwujiu...@gmail.com: compile protobuf2.3.0,2.4.1 on
aix5.3,error happened when i make
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=629
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.configure
Comment #9 on issue 476 by plind...@google.com: please document how to use
protobuf with maven
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=476
I'd be happy to shepherd any maven patches into the protobuf core and/or
assist with delegation of the namespace. I recently landed pa
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 628 by robert.e...@gmail.com: Update ThirdPartyAddOns link to
protobuf-c
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=628
Hi,
The protobuf-c project has moved from http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-c/
to https
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 627 by dbarn...@google.com: Could we host proto.vim in a separate
project?
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=627
I'd like to push a version of the vim syntax file to a standalone g
Comment #12 on issue 370 by scpet...@osrfoundation.org: static
initialization problem with dlopen
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=370
The patch in comment #10 works for us as well. Is there any chance that it
will be merged? I can generate some code to help reproduce the
Comment #2 on issue 626 by nio...@gmail.com: 64bit portability issue
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=626
'return' conversion from '__int64' to 'Int' possible lose of data.
run the app on 64bit os lead app crash.
--
You received this message beca
Comment #6 on issue 488 by wscul...@gmail.com: powerpc-linux cross
compilation not compiling anymore
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=488
The application of the two patches from this ticket to the current trunk
enables a build on powerpc64 linux which otherwise fails with
Comment #1 on issue 626 by xiaof...@google.com: 64bit portability issue
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=626
What's the compile error? I think we can and a static_cast to suppress the
error message. There is no chance the index can be larger than 32bit.
--
You rec
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 626 by nio...@gmail.com: 64bit portability issue
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=626
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.Function 'int index() const' in class of &
Comment #10 on issue 434 by adam.gra...@upverter.com: With
PROTOCOL_BUFFERS_PYTHON_IMPLEMENTATION=cpp, parent object deleted while
child still exists: causes segmentation fault
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=434
A fix for this is crucial for us. I would be tempted to
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 625 by f.volej...@gmail.com: Exception safety issues in
RepeatedPtrField
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=625
Hello,
the method RepeatedPtrFieldBase::Add has a exception safety problem
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 624 by nsampie...@gmail.com: MSVC 12.0 solution compile issue.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=624
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Download and uncompress the last source.
2. Try to
Comment #6 on issue 622 by veer...@gmail.com: Retrieving
Country,Zipcode,postalcode,State and DMA code from geo_criteria_id
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=622
Hi,
I did not understand pom.xml file. issue what i raised is when we get
request, how can we get the country
Comment #5 on issue 622 by xiaof...@google.com: Retrieving
Country,Zipcode,postalcode,State and DMA code from geo_criteria_id
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=622
Hi alx.zykoff, can you create a separate issue for the pom.xml problem?
Thanks.
--
You received this
Comment #4 on issue 622 by alx.zyk...@gmail.com: Retrieving
Country,Zipcode,postalcode,State and DMA code from geo_criteria_id
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=622
hi in pom.xml
(http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/downloads/detail?name=protobuf-2.5.0.tar.bz2&can
Updates:
Status: OutOfScope
Comment #3 on issue 622 by xiaof...@google.com: Retrieving
Country,Zipcode,postalcode,State and DMA code from geo_criteria_id
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=622
This is the protobuf issue tracker. You probably want to post AdWords API
Comment #2 on issue 622 by veer...@gmail.com: Retrieving
Country,Zipcode,postalcode,State and DMA code from geo_criteria_id
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=622
Geographical Targeting file issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Comment #1 on issue 623 by xiaof...@google.com: Hot to check the latency
when using Python Script to send Bid Requests
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=623
Hi, I think you are posting to the wrong place. Probably you want to post
questions in this forum:
https
Comment #1 on issue 622 by xiaof...@google.com: Retrieving
Country,Zipcode,postalcode,State and DMA code from geo_criteria_id
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=622
Is this a protobuf issue?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 623 by veer...@gmail.com: Hot to check the latency when using
Python Script to send Bid Requests
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=623
Hi,
Hot to check the latency when using Python Script
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 622 by veer...@gmail.com: Retrieving
Country,Zipcode,postalcode,State and DMA code from geo_criteria_id
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=622
Hi,
We are trying to get Country,Zipcode
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 621 by sta...@gmail.com: Python library does not run setup.py
under a Python 3.x interpreter
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=621
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Run setup.py with
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #3 on issue 619 by xiaof...@google.com: Memoryleak since change
const ::std::string kEmptyString to const ::std::string& GetEmptyString()
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=619
ok, so the problem is that we should register a shut
Comment #2 on issue 619 by berthold...@googlemail.com: Memoryleak since
change const ::std::string kEmptyString to const ::std::string&
GetEmptyString()
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=619
Hallo, I provide you with the collected files of my investigations. I hope
Comment #4 on issue 620 by veer...@gmail.com: Concerting ByteString to
String
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=620
Hi,
I am not getting any error but not able to convert ID and IPAddress.
Let us say when i want to augment, basically by IP will be getting
City,Zipcode
Comment #3 on issue 620 by xiaof...@google.com: Concerting ByteString to
String
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=620
What's the code that leads to your reported error:
Actual ID Value: [B@65abc63a
Expected O/P: "Mv\2005\000\017.\001\n\345\177\307X\200M8"
Comment #2 on issue 620 by veer...@gmail.com: Concerting ByteString to
String
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=620
attached is the protobuff file and below is the code for the conversion
public static String AdXRequest(Object O, Concept req) {
String ps
Comment #1 on issue 620 by xiaof...@google.com: Concerting ByteString to
String
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=620
What's the proto definition and what's the code converting the message to
string format?
--
You received this message because this project is
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 607 by xiaof...@google.com: Replace TSan API
declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
Committed as r521
--
You received this message because this project is
Comment #1 on issue 619 by xiaof...@google.com: Memoryleak since change
const ::std::string kEmptyString to const ::std::string& GetEmptyString()
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=619
Can you narrow down the cause and provide us a simple source file that can
reproduce
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 531
Comment #3 on issue 616 by xiaof...@google.com:
zero_copy_stream_impl_lite.cc needs for min/max definitions
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=616
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this
Comment #9 on issue 531 by xiaof...@google.com: Cannot build protobuf using
VS2013
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=531
Issue 616 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 606 by xiaof...@google.com: Small issue building under
Win32
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=606
Fixed in r512. Will be included in next release.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #8 on issue 531 by xiaof...@google.com: Cannot build protobuf using
VS2013
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=531
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 620 by veer...@gmail.com: Concerting ByteString to String
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=620
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Sending the Request using Python request
2. Receiving
Comment #3 on issue 607 by gli...@chromium.org: Replace TSan API
declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
Ping?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 619 by brave...@webrtc.org: Memoryleak since change
const ::std::string kEmptyString to const ::std::string& GetEmptyString()
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=619
What steps will repro
Comment #2 on issue 616 by yuk...@google.com: zero_copy_stream_impl_lite.cc
needs for min/max definitions
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=616
And I guess this is a dup of Issue 531.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #1 on issue 606 by yuk...@google.com: Small issue building under
Win32
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=606
See Issue 531. This issue was fixed as r512. Maybe next release will
contain the fix.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to
Comment #1 on issue 616 by yuk...@google.com: zero_copy_stream_impl_lite.cc
needs for min/max definitions
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=616
This issue was fixed as r512.
Maybe next release will contain the fix.
--
You received this message because this project is
Comment #6 on issue 493 by lshmouse: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
To keep the compatibility, i do a little hack in getUnknownFields and
deploy a new version protobuf-java. It works fine
Comment #5 on issue 493 by hisanth...@gmail.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
protobuf is embedded into many hadoop libraries (pig, hadoop, hive,...),
breaking compatibility is definitly
Comment #1 on issue 618 by marvin...@gmail.com: Cannot compile protobuf in
Solaris 10 x86
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=618
Here is the config.log in gtest sub-directory
Attachments:
gtest-config.log 7.0 KB
--
You received this message because this project is
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 618 by marvin...@gmail.com: Cannot compile protobuf in Solaris 10
x86
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=618
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. ./configure (under root)
2.
3.
What is
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 617 by ivan.the...@gmail.com: Protobuf fails to build on
Linux/SPARC
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=617
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Fetch protobuf 2.5.0 or svn r518.
2
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 616 by bruce.c...@gmail.com: zero_copy_stream_impl_lite.cc needs
for min/max definitions
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=616
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Try and build using
Comment #3 on issue 464 by won...@gmail.com: Inefficient Java handling of
repeated list of primitive types
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=464
Hi,
We had the same issue at Two Sigma, so we developed a patch that *does not*
adds any dependency.
It passes all the unit
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 615 by xiaof...@google.com: misleading document in
python api
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=615
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 615 by ccpp...@gmail.com: misleading document in python api
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=615
The document for python api ParseFromString is misleading as following:
def ParseFromString(self
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 614 by vi...@umich.edu: ByteString: Method For Chunking
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=614
The internal usage of RopeByteString (and RopeInputStream) is particularly
interesting. Alongside
Comment #5 on issue 406 by peterjne...@gmail.com: Generated code fails to
compile on OpenBSD
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=406
Correction, this does actually need the -isystem bit removed to work on
OpenBSD.
--
You received this message because this project is
Comment #4 on issue 406 by peterjne...@gmail.com: Generated code fails to
compile on OpenBSD
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=406
I work with Simon on the same project and the issue came up again. After a
bit of digging I found this link, which talks about the prefix
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 613 by ppra...@google.com: protoc: Add options to redirect input
/ output to files.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=613
What is the problem?
When used with --encode / --decode
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 612 by xiaof...@google.com: Broken link to
documentation on "UserGuide" wiki page on code.google.com
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=612
I just updated the link to the correct address:
https://developers.
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 612 by volkersi...@gmail.com: Broken link to documentation
on "UserGuide" wiki page on code.google.com
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=612
What steps will reproduce the problem?
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 611 by patr...@dropbox.com: Python proto optimization
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=611
(original thread)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/protobuf/RDAKafkfXYM
I wrote a patch which optimize
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 609 by jhaf...@gmail.com: protoc produces java code with compiler
errors when terminating message field names with "field"
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=609
1. Use protoc
Comment #2 on issue 464 by anno.lan...@gmail.com: Inefficient Java handling
of repeated list of primitive types
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=464
I produced a different fix that preserves the immutability of the
non-builders and, specifically, does not expose the
Comment #2 on issue 229 by k...@spotify.com: TextFormat should have option
to silently ignore unknown fields
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=229
We use the text format for fixture data in our test cases (we don't want to
have binary data in our repository), a
Comment #1 on issue 608 by ce.slate...@gmail.com: Failed to build 2.5.0, on
Win7, Cygwin, MSVS 2012 express
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=608
Guess I should have tried a clean build from a new download, I was using a
2.5.0 package that I had run VS 2008 on, a clean
Comment #1 on issue 602 by mm42...@googlemail.com: Protobuf fails to build
on Solaris 10/11
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=602
It would be nice to get protobuf working again on FreeBSD/sparc64 also. If
anybody needs testing resources for that, ping me.
--
You received
Comment #20 on issue 213 by nellaivi...@gmail.com: libprotobuf.so.6 not
found after installation
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=213
I have similar issue in the Cent OS 6.5, ldconfig saved my day. Thanks
Kenton.
--
You received this message because this project is
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 608 by ce.slate...@gmail.com: Failed to build 2.5.0, on Win7,
Cygwin, MSVS 2012 express
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=608
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.Unpacked Zip, read
Comment #2 on issue 607 by gli...@chromium.org: Replace TSan API
declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
This header comes from the compiler that supports ThreadSanitizer (that's
Clang 3.3+ or GCC 4.7+)
Comment #1 on issue 607 by xiaof...@google.com: Replace TSan API
declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
Where does this header file come from? Does it mean that users will need to
install these header files
Comment #3 on issue 575 by molind: Google Protobuf will not build under
ARM64
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=575
I checked on device (iPhone 5s). It works fine with this workaround.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 607 by gli...@google.com: Replace TSan API declarations in
atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
The attached patch replaces the TSan API
Comment #8 on issue 570 by msaf...@gmail.com: build 2.4.1 failed on mac os
x 10.9
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=570
Adding #include worked for me as well.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address
Comment #5 on issue 488 by andrew.i...@gmail.com: powerpc-linux cross
compilation not compiling anymore
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=488
AArch64 is becoming more widely available.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #1 on issue 605 by pedrolea...@gmail.com: protoc just segfaults on
FreeBSD 10-RELEASE arm
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=605
protobuf 2.4.1 successfully built on the same system.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 606 by ramon.ga...@gmail.com: Small issue building under Win32
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=606
I have a small issue building protocol buffers 2.5.0 under Visual Studio
Express 2013
The file
Comment #44 on issue 57 by osu...@gmail.com: null values should be treated
as no value
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57
Interesting thread. I love protobuf. I think the foundation of the
disagreement is in comment #33:
"[We] do not like the idea of treating "
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 605 by pedrolea...@gmail.com: protoc just segfaults on FreeBSD
10-RELEASE arm
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=605
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. FreeBSD on a raspberry pi (or
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 604 by mikio...@gmail.com: Option to include stdfix.h in output
cc files.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=604
for visual studio projects with precompiled headers option on
--
You received this message
Comment #1 on issue 603 by chaishus...@gmail.com: descriptor.proto: suggest
add go_generic_services optional for golang.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=603
add:
optional bool go_generic_services = 19 [default=false];
Attachments:
add_go_generic_services.patch
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 603 by chaishus...@gmail.com: descriptor.proto: suggest add
go_generic_services optional for golang.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=603
In SVN r425, the go_package optional has been added
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 602 by j.l.ols...@gmail.com: Protobuf fails to build on Solaris
10/11
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=602
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Try to build on Solaris 10/11 with GCC or
Comment #7 on issue 570 by getae...@gmail.com: build 2.4.1 failed on mac os
x 10.9
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=570
"Adding #include " solution worked for me
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notificatio
Comment #7 on issue 515 by peterhan...@yahoo.com: More intelligent enums
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=515
The proposed solution doesn't work because:
1. The name of the enum type is changed from "Foo" to "Foo::Enum" which
will be confusing to
Comment #6 on issue 515 by xiaof...@google.com: More intelligent enums
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=515
Disallowing C++11 features is more of a policy issue rather than a
technical one. The policy will eventually change but so far I haven't seen
any move in
Comment #5 on issue 515 by cbsm...@gmail.com: More intelligent enums
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=515
Why not put it in now with a flag or an #ifdef on the C++ version?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to
Comment #4 on issue 515 by xiaof...@google.com: More intelligent enums
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=515
I think the support for C++11 enum class is a good feature to have. We'll
need to wait for some time though, as we currently still prohibit C++11
featur
Comment #3 on issue 515 by kara...@gmail.com: More intelligent enums
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=515
Instead of `namespace Bar { enum ...`, we could use `enum class Bar ...',
or perhaps `struct Bar { enum ...`.
For myself, I don't care much about duplicated
Comment #2 on issue 515 by xiaof...@google.com: More intelligent enums
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=515
The proposed solution doesn't work because:
1. The name of the enum type is changed from "Foo" to "Foo::Enum" which
will be confusing to the u
Comment #1 on issue 515 by joew...@live.com: More intelligent enums
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=515
I would say the option name is a little language specific, but the idea is
good. Maybe call it "scoped=true" or something similar and add a
command-line prot
Comment #1 on issue 596 by jrolt...@gmail.com: protoc cannot decode files
larger than 67108864 bytes
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=596
I get "failed to parse input" with a small file too - not just a very large
one. Are you having issues with just big fi
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 601 by chaudhar...@gmail.com: include files are not compiling
properly
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=601
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. i buiilded google protocol in solaris X86 32 bit
Comment #1 on issue 599 by pe...@quux.net: Fails to compile for Intel Phi
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=599
Thanks Stephen. ICC supports GCC's inline assembly syntax. I've applied
your suggestion and tested it. An updated patch is attached.
/peter
A
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 600 by amis...@google.com: Add a flag to generate C++ includes
using "" instead of <>
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=600
Right now, the generated C++ code uses #include <
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 599 by pe...@quux.net: Fails to compile for Intel Phi
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=599
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Install Intel Composer XE with Intel Xeon Phi support
2
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 597 by xiaof...@google.com: Add sbt-cppp to
ThirdPartyAddOns wiki page, please
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=597
Done. Added to the "Other utilities" section.
--
You received this message because this
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 598 by liuj...@google.com: unused parameter warnings
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=598
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
401 - 500 of 2413 matches
Mail list logo
