On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Adam wrote:
>
> I found a work-around to search the group if anyone is interested.
>
> Go to: http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/
> Enter text and click Search.
> Click on the 'Protocol Buffers Groups' tab.
The other approach (which is the one I used af
I found a work-around to search the group if anyone is interested.
Go to: http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/
Enter text and click Search.
Click on the 'Protocol Buffers Groups' tab.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscrib
The groups people are working on fixing this.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Scott Stafford wrote:
>
> I'm having zero results too, searching for "DescriptorPool" for
> instance.
>
> On Aug 4, 7:54 pm, Kenton Varda wrote:
> > Interesting. I'll file a bug against google groups.
> >
> >
> >
> >
I'm having zero results too, searching for "DescriptorPool" for
instance.
On Aug 4, 7:54 pm, Kenton Varda wrote:
> Interesting. I'll file a bug against google groups.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Adam wrote:
>
> > On Aug 4, 5:16 pm, Kenton Varda wrote:
> > > What were you searching
Interesting. I'll file a bug against google groups.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Adam wrote:
>
> On Aug 4, 5:16 pm, Kenton Varda wrote:
> > What were you searching for? Are you sure there should be results?
>
> I originally searched for 'rpc' which I'm pretty sure in the past
> brought up
On Aug 4, 5:16 pm, Kenton Varda wrote:
> What were you searching for? Are you sure there should be results?
I originally searched for 'rpc' which I'm pretty sure in the past
brought up over 3 pages of results.
I've been archiving the emails locally from the group for over a year.
To test the s
What were you searching for? Are you sure there should be results?
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:07 PM, yellen wrote:
>
> I'm finding that the search function provided by the group is
> returning much less than I expect. Is anyone else having similar
> trouble?
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~---
I'm finding that the search function provided by the group is
returning much less than I expect. Is anyone else having similar
trouble?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post