Re: [protobuf] Protobuff-net lightFramework

2010-06-08 Thread Stuart Johnson
Thanks Marc. I'm just using core serialization. I resue the same PB classes on verious different c# apps, and since using them on silverlight, needed to introduce the lightFramework option. I wanted to avoid having to compile everything twice. On 08/06/10 21:14, Marc Gravell wrote: It omit

Re: [protobuf] Protobuff-net lightFramework

2010-06-08 Thread Marc Gravell
It omits: [Serializable] against types (for use if you are using protobuf-net **within** BinaryFormatter, perhaps for remoting purposes) [Browsable(false)] against the "{name}Specified" properties that help guide XmlSerializer [ProtoBehavior] against operation-contracts (since Silverlight etc does

[protobuf] Protobuff-net lightFramework

2010-06-08 Thread Stuart
If I use the -p:lightFramework option on protogen.exe, does anything important get left out for use on the full framework? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To uns