Comment #4 on issue 454 by johannes...@googlemail.com: Python API parallel
read access is not thread safe when repeated fields are empty
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=454
But that's a severe violation of the documented behavior if the message
classes in fact aren't thre
Comment #3 on issue 454 by xiaof...@google.com: Python API parallel read
access is not thread safe when repeated fields are empty
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=454
I have had a look at this problem before. There are several places where
_fields.iteritems() is used. I am
Comment #2 on issue 454 by johannes...@googlemail.com: Python API parallel
read access is not thread safe when repeated fields are empty
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=454
Any ideas on this? Actually I would have expected that such a bug will make
it into the next releas
Updates:
Cc: f...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 454 by liuj...@google.com: Python API parallel read
access is not thread safe when repeated fields are empty
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=454
Adding Frank to take a look.
--
You received this message because you a
