Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #12 on issue 60 by xiaof...@google.com: Support static values
in .proto files
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=60
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Comment #13 on issue 60 by e...@rjump.com: Support static values in .proto
files
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=60
Is there somewhere that explains the reasoning behind not wanting this? Is
there another option/approach/design that resolves this need?
--
You received
Comment #14 on issue 60 by xiaof...@google.com: Support static values
in .proto files
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=60
For every new feature we always consider its benefit against the
complication it adds to protobuf API and we usually weigh API complications
much
1. more plain and then readable code
package::CONSTANT_NAME vs
package::Constants::default_instance().constant()
2. compile time const is irreplaceable for many C++ code, such as array
bound and template value parameter.
3. safety, default value can be changed careless.
在
Field options can provide this capability unless you are really looking for
the ability to just not type the same value? I would think the default
value and field options would work. It is possible I don't fully
understand your use case.
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:23:39 AM UTC-8,
Comment #11 on issue 60 by chen3f...@gmail.com: Support static values
in .proto files
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=60
Support constant in proto is very useful
const int64 DefaultType = 1000;
optional int64 type = 1 [default=DefaultType];
--
You received this message
Comment #10 on issue 60 by anish...@gmail.com: Support static values
in .proto files
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=60
But even though it had getters and setters,
here need only the getters..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #8 on issue 60 by mer...@google.com: Support static values
in .proto files
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=60
I've been wishing for this once in a while.
There's a workaround: Protobuf actually does have a syntax for literal
values: field defaults. So you can
