Comment #14 on issue 60 by xiaof...@google.com: Support static values
in .proto files
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=60
For every new feature we always consider its benefit against the
complication it adds to protobuf API and we usually weigh API complications
much mo
Comment #13 on issue 60 by e...@rjump.com: Support static values in .proto
files
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=60
Is there somewhere that explains the reasoning behind not wanting this? Is
there another option/approach/design that resolves this need?
--
You received
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #12 on issue 60 by xiaof...@google.com: Support static values
in .proto files
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=60
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
1. more plain and then readable code
package::CONSTANT_NAME vs
package::Constants::default_instance().constant()
2. compile time const is irreplaceable for many C++ code, such as array
bound and template value parameter.
3. safety, default value can be changed careless.
在 2013年1月26日星期六UTC+8上午10时
Field options can provide this capability unless you are really looking for
the ability to just not type the same value? I would think the default
value and field options would work. It is possible I don't fully
understand your use case.
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:23:39 AM UTC-8, prot...
Comment #11 on issue 60 by chen3f...@gmail.com: Support static values
in .proto files
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=60
Support constant in proto is very useful
const int64 DefaultType = 1000;
optional int64 type = 1 [default=DefaultType];
--
You received this message be
Comment #10 on issue 60 by anish...@gmail.com: Support static values
in .proto files
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=60
But even though it had getters and setters,
here need only the getters..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pr
Comment #8 on issue 60 by mer...@google.com: Support static values
in .proto files
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=60
I've been wishing for this once in a while.
There's a workaround: Protobuf actually does have a syntax for literal
values: field defaults. So you can def