[protobuf] Re: Issue 678 in protobuf: HasExtension() called on a repeated field should cause a compile error (Protobuf 2.4.1)

2014-11-06 Thread protobuf
Comment #3 on issue 678 by kaspar.f...@dreizak.com: HasExtension() called on a repeated field should cause a compile error (Protobuf 2.4.1) https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=678 That makes sense – and is consistent with the other uses of "has" in the API. Thanks for the re

[protobuf] Re: Issue 678 in protobuf: HasExtension() called on a repeated field should cause a compile error (Protobuf 2.4.1)

2014-11-06 Thread protobuf
Updates: Summary: HasExtension() called on a repeated field should cause a compile error (Protobuf 2.4.1) Owner: xiaof...@google.com Comment #2 on issue 678 by xiaof...@google.com: HasExtension() called on a repeated field should cause a compile error (Protobuf 2.4.1) https://code.